IBN SINONING “ISHORALAR VA TANBEHLAR” ASARI VA POSTKLASSIK ISLOM FALSAFASINING BOSHLANISHI

Сохибжон Умаржонов

doi:10.47390/1342V3I1Y2023N4

Авторы

Сохибжон Умаржонов

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/1342V3I1Y2023N4

Ключевые слова:

«Тахафут», «Теория кризис», тахкик, мухаккик, апоретические и экзегетические комментарии, шакк, шукук, хошия или талика, мухтасар или мулахxас.

Аннотация

В данной статье труд Ибн Сины «Указаний и замечаний», ставший центром научных, философских и богословских дискуссий на мусульманском Востоке и обсуждаются мнения ряда европейских востоковедов, в том числе Майкла Рапопорта, Аймана Шихаде, Висновского и Ван Лита, проводивших научные исследования комментариев, написанных к этому труду.

Библиографические ссылки

Buyuk ajdodlarga munosib avlod bo’lish mas’uliyati. http://uza.uz/posts/56030

Murojaat sanasi: 21.04.2017.

Rapoport, Michael. A. The Life and Afterlife of the Rational Soul: Chapters VIII-X of Ibn Sina’s Pointers and Reminders and Their Commentaries: Doctor of philosophy. …diss. - Yale University, 2018. – 500 p.

Griffel, Frank. “Al-Ghazali’s (d. 1111) Incoherence of the Philosophers.” In The Oxford Handbook o f Islamic Philosophy, edited by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke. Oxford Handbooks Online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016.- p. 191-210.

Heer, Nicolas. “Al-Razi and al-Tusi on Ibn Sina’s Theory of Emanation.” In Neoplatonism and Islamic Thought, edited by Parviz Morewedge, 111-25. Studies in Neoplatonism 5. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.

Frank, Richard M. Al-Ghazali and the Ash’arite School. Duke Monographs in Medieval and Renaissance Studies 15. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press, 1994.

Frank, Richard M. Creation and the Cosmic System: Al-Ghazali and Avicenna. Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse. Heidelberg: Winter, 1992.

Shihadeh, Ayman. “Al-Raz’s (d. 1210) Commentary on Avicenna’s Pointers: The Confluence of Exegesis and Aporetics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy, edited by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke. Oxford Handbooks Online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016. – p. 296-326.

Umarov, M. L. (2022). Nosiruddin Tusiyning gnoseologik va mantiqiy qarashlari hamda mazkur masalalarga muallif asarlaridan misollar. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 3(9), 139-141.

Umarov, M. L. (2022). Nosiruddin Tusiy qarashlarida borliq masalasiga munosabat. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 2(2), 722-726.

Umarov, M. L. (2021). Nosiriddin Tusiyning hayot yo’li va ma’naviy merosi. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 1(8).

Wisnovsky, Robert. “Avicenna’s Islamic Reception.” In Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays, edited by Peter Adamson, 190-214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Lameer, Joep. (2013). “Towards a New Edition of Avicenna’s Kitab al-isharat wa-l-tanbihat” Journal of Islamic Manuscripts 4, no. 2, 199-248.

Gutas, Dimitri. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Second, Revised, and Enlarged Edition, Including an Inventory o f Avicenna’s Authentic Works. Islamic Philosophy, Theology, and Science, v. 89. Boston: Brill, 2014.- p. 617.

Wisnovsky, Robert. “Essence and Existence in the Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Islamic East (Masriq): A Sketch.” In The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception o f Avicenna’s Metaphysics, edited by Dag Nikolaus Hasse and Amos Bertolacci, 27-50. Scientia Graeco-Arabica, Bd. 7. Berlin; New York, N.Y: De Gruyter, 2012.

McGinnis, Jon. “Nasir al-Din al-Tusi (d. 1274): Sharh al-Isharat.” In The Oxford handbook of Islamic philosophy, edited by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke. Oxford Handbooks Online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016.-p. 326-348.

Saifnazarov, I., Muxatarov, A., Sultonov, T., Nazarov, N., Rahimbabayeva, N., Doniyorov, X., Usmonov, F. Falsafa. Darslik. – Toshkent.: “Innovatsion rivojlanish nashriyoti”, 2021. – 424 b.

Wisnovsky, Robert. (2013). Avicennism and Exegetical Practice in the Early Commentaries on the Ishara. Oriens 41, no. 3-4, 349-78.

Shihadeh, Ayman. (2016). Doubts on Avicenna: A Study and Edition of Sharaf al-Din al-Mas’udi’s Commentary on the Isharat. Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science. Texts and Studies 95. Leiden, Boston: Brill. - p.44-49.

Lit, L. W. C. (Eric) van. (2017). Commentary and Commentary Tradition.” MIDEO. Melanges de VInstitut dominicain d’etudes orientales, no. 32, 3-26.

Ahmed, Asad Q. “Post-Classical Philosophical Commentaries/Glosses: Innovation in the Margins.” Oriens 41, no. 3—4 (2013): 317-348.

Ал-Розий, Фаҳриддин. Шарх аль-Ишарат ва-л-танбихат. ЎзР ФА Шарқшунослик институти, Инв: 4957/1, 1б-18б. (араб тилида).

Ал-Розий, Фаҳриддин. Шарх аль-Ишарат ва-л-танбихат. ЎзР ФА Шарқшунослик институти, Инв: 4957/2, 18а-271б. (араб тилида).

Umarjonov, S. (2022). Muhammad ibn Umar Fahriddin Roziy asarlarining qisqacha sharhi. Imom Buxoriy saboqlari, 1, 24-25.

At-Tusiy, Nosiruddin Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn al-Xasan. Hall mushkilot al-Ishorat. O’zR FA Sharqshunoslik instituti, Inv: 2065, milodiy 1271. (arab tilida).

At-Tustariy, Muhammad ibn Abdulla al-Bag’dodiy. Sharh al-Ishorat. O’zR FA Sharqshunoslik instituti, Inv: 3201, milodiy 1333. (arab tilida).

At-Taxtaniy, Qutbiddin ibn Muhammad ar-Roziy. Al-Muhokama baynal-Imam val-Nasir. O’zR FA Sharqshunoslik instituti, Inv: 2433, taxminan XVII asr. (arab tilida).