ANALYSIS OF MODERN APPROACHES TO PROVIDING THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I8Y2024N49Keywords:
digitization, privacy, privacy, personal data, protection from interference in private life, privacy of personal data, non-disclosure of information related to honor and dignity without their consent.Abstract
This article presents a theoretical analysis of the impact of digital technologies on the right to privacy. the development of digital technologies, the widespread introduction of digital technologies in the life of our society, and the need to carry out scientific research on ensuring the privacy of citizens living in our country. Therefore, it is necessary to study and analyze the concept of the right to privacy from a conceptual, scientific and methodological point of view. If we consider the right of every person to make a moral and ethical evaluation of his qualities as his personal right, it is considered to have a subjective nature. Therefore, His dignity and reputation may or may not be compatible with the social opinion in the society. The author focused on "circumstances that violate privacy", "protection from interference in personal life", "international standards of personal information", "not disclosing information about honor and dignity without their consent". The article analyzes the advanced experience of foreign countries and the approaches of legal scholars to the privacy of personal life, comprehensive analysis of the right to privacy in the context of digitization and the specific features of its constitutional and legal regulation, improvement of the legislation of Uzbekistan on privacy is to present proposals on
References
1. Available at: https://kun.uz/uz/news/2022/09/08/sariosiyoda-4-sinf-oquvchisi-zorlangan-holat-boyicha-prokuror-va-iib-masulining-javobi-bir-biriga-togri-kelmayapt i
2. O‘zbekistonda ham koronavirus qayd etildi [The coronavirus was also recorded in Uzbekistan]. Available at: https://xabardor.uz/uz/x/576521
3. Uzbekistan News Agency website. Available at: https://uza.uz/uz/posts/shaxsiy-hayot-daxlsizligi-konstituciyaviy-kafolatlanmoqda_393451
4. What is happening around MP Feruza Babasheva? Available at: https://www.gazeta.uz/uz/2021/11/18/feruza-babasheva/
5. Violation of privacy is prohibited by law. Available at: https://iiv.uz/oz/news/shaxsiy-hayot-daxlsizligini-buzish-qonun-bilan-taqiqlangan
6. Murphy M. C., Wilds M. R. X-rated X-ray invades privacy rights. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2001, no. 4, pp. 333–343.
7. The Central Bank urges to beware of fraudulent situations. Available at: https://cbu.uz/oz/press_center/news/425173/
8. Soliev S. va Sh.Nazarov Hususiy mulk daxlsizligini ta’minlash // Odil sudlov. – T., 2021. – № 2. – B. 26.
9. Mo‘minov O. Yana aybsizlik prezumpsiyasi haqida // Advokat. – T., 2020. – № 3. – B. 29.
10. Izzatullaev B. O‘zbekistonda elektron hukumat // Odil sudlov. – T., 2021. – № 8. – B. 23.
11. Shermuhammedova A. Mamlakatimizda ijtimoiy tarmoqlarning shakllanishi, tendensiyalari va xususiyatlari // Fuqarolik jamiyati. – T., 2021. – № 2. – B. 25.
12. Naomi Colvin. “Whistle-Blowing as a Form of Digital Resistance: State Crimes and Crimes Against the State.” State Crime Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018, P. 41.
13. Carly Nyst. “Secrets and Lies: The Proliferation of State Surveillance Capabilities and the Legislative Secrecy Which Fortifies Them – An Activist’s Account.” State Crime Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018, P. 19.
14. Pozen, David E. “Privacy-Privacy Tradeoffs.” The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 83, no. 1, 2016, P. 225.
15. Bambauer, Derek E. “Privacy versus security” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973), vol. 103, no. 3, 2013, P. 669.
16. Cohen, Julie E. “What privacy is for.” Harvard Law Review, vol. 126, no. 7, 2013, P. 1904.
17. Rule J. B. Privacy in peril: How we are sacrificing a fundamental right in exchange for security and convenience. Oxford University Press, 2007. Available at: https://books.google.co.uz/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=WKxMuD-O02wC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&ots=MdS4FZ41lY&sig=Q6bQ68Ia_uM1nRiBeTRugNe8MgM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
18. Stepanović I. et al. Modern technology and challenges to protection of the right to privacy. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2014, no. 3, pp. 167–178. Available at: https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2014/0003-25651403167S.pdf
19. Prosser, W. L. (1960). Privacy. California Law Review, no. 48, pp. 383-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3478805
20. Fakhriddin, M. STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES OF THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN UZBEKISTAN. World Bulletin of Management and Law, 2023, no. 19, pp. 67–72.
21. Solove D. J. A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania law review, 2006, pp. 477–564.
22. Solove DJ 2006. Maxfiylik taksonomiyasi [A taxonomy of privacy]. Pensilvanie law University Rev. 154, no 3, 477.
23. De Terwangne C. Council of Europe convention 108+: A modernised international treaty for the protection of personal data. Computer Law & Security Review. 2021, p. 105497.
24. Regulation P. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Regulation (eu). 2016, p. 2016.
25. Sajfert J., Quintel T. Data Protection Directive (EU) 2016/680 for police and criminal justice authorities.
26. Buttarelli G. The EU GDPR as a clarion call for a new global digital gold standard. International Data Privacy Law, 2016, no. 2, pp. 77-78.
