FROM SCALPEL TO BLACKBOARD: HOW MEDICAL TRAINING IS REVOLUTIONIZING PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4SI7Y2024N33Keywords:
Medical Education, Pedagogical Innovation, Simulation-Based, Learning, Digital Learning Platforms, Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Interprofessional Education (IPE), Active Learning, Clinical Training, Educational Technology, Teaching Methodologies.Abstract
This article investigates the transformative changes in medical education as it shifts from traditional, hands-on training to innovative pedagogical methods. The study highlights the impact of advanced technologies, interdisciplinary collaboration, and patient-centered care on modern medical training. Through a mixed-methods approach, encompassing literature reviews, surveys, interviews, focus groups, and case studies, the research explores the adoption and effectiveness of simulation-based learning, digital platforms, problem-based learning (PBL), and interprofessional education (IPE). Key findings reveal widespread adoption of these methods, improved clinical skills and student engagement, but also significant challenges such as resource limitations and resistance to change. The study calls for further research into the long-term effects of these innovations and emphasizes the need for strategic planning and support to overcome implementation barriers.
References
1. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
2. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
3. Gulfura Tashmetova. (2022). TIBBIYOT TALABALARINING MULOQOT KO‘NIKMALARINI MEDIATEXNOLOGIYALAR ASOSIDA SHAKLLANTIRISH VA RIVOJLANTIRISH. Proceedings of Scientific Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(3), 96–98. Retrieved from https://econferenceseries.com/index.php/scms/article/view/554
4. Smith, G., & Cardaciotto, L. (2011). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 53-61.
5. Akramova Z., Baxtiyorova Sh. Tibbiy matnlarni tarjima qilish // Academic research in educational sciences. –T.: TMA Conference, 2023.–B. 596-603.URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tibbiy-matnlarni-tarjima-qilish/viewer3. Aсилова Г.А.
6. Reeves, S., Fletcher, S., Barr, H., Birch, I., Boet, S., Davies, N., ... & Kitto, S. (2016). A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Medical Teacher, 38(7), 656-668.
7. Thistlethwaite, J. E. (2012). Interprofessional education: A review of context, learning and the research agenda. Medical Education, 46(1), 58-70.
8. Barr, H., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., Hammick, M., & Freeth, D. (2005). Effective interprofessional education: Argument, assumption, and evidence. John Wiley & Sons.
9. Dildora Baxtiyarovna, S. ., & Surayyo, M. . (2022). TIBBIYOTDA KASBIY PEDAGOGIK BILIMLARINING O’RNI. Scientific Impulse, 1(3), 402–405. Retrieved from http://nauchniyimpuls.ru/index.php/ni/article/view/982
10. Kodirova, S., Mustaeva, G., & Mustaeva , . G. (2024). KLINIK MAShG‘ULOTLARDA INNVATSION TEXNOLOGIYANING O‘RNI VA AHAMIYATI. Бюллетень педагогов нового Узбекистана, 2(5), 73–76. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/yopa/article/view/32742
