PRAGMATIC FEATURES OF PERSONAL NAMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I8Y2025N27Keywords:
linguistics, pragmatics, personal names, English language, approach, Uzbek language, pragmalinguistics.Abstract
This article presents reflections on the development of linguistics with a particular focus on personal names and their pragmatic features. It discusses the emergence of pragmatics as an independent field within linguistics and explores various debates surrounding this process. The study also analyzes the approaches of prominent linguists to the development of pragmatics and highlights the significance of these perspectives in understanding the pragmatic dimensions of personal names.
References
1. Bar Hillel. Pragmatics of natural languages. Dordrecht, Holland: D.Reidel. 1971. P-231
2. Layons. J. Proceedings of the twelfth International Congress of Linguists, Vienna, August 28 - September 2, 1977
3. Kasher, A. 1998. ‘Postscript’, in A. Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics: critical concepts, London: Routledge, pp.144-54.
4. Chomsky, N. 1995. “Language and nature”. Mind 104 (413): p 1–61
5. Catts, S. V. (2002a). Disturbed communication in schizophrenia: the role of poor pragmatics and poor mind-reading. Psychol. Med. 32, P 1273–1284.
6. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 137-326.
7. Van Deyk, T.A. Язык. познание. коммуникация / T.A.Van Deyk. – B.: BGK im. I.A. Boduena de Kurtene, 2000. - 308 p.
8. Bakhtiyor Mengliyev, Guli Toirova, Javlon Ibragimov, and Munira Mengliyeva The necessity of Pareto principle in environmental studies. E3S Web of Conferences 587, 02018 (2024) GreenEnergy 2024 –P. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458702018
