SOCIAL NETWORK ECOSYSTEM: STUDYING THE ROLES OF INTERESTED PARTIES IN THE CONTEXT OF CIVIL LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SCP1342V3I8Y2023N45Keywords:
civil law, social media, particpants, account owner, subscriber, regulator, advertiser.Abstract
This article discusses the various parties involved in social media relationships, namely: social media platform owner, user, contributor, regulator, and advertiser. Overall, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on civil law regulation in social media by emphasizing the importance of a holistic approach to addressing the concerns and interests of various stakeholders.
References
Belousova, O., Karpova, E., & Tarasova, M. (2021). The influence of virtual and real-life social connections on social network interactions. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 101473.
Choi, M., & Lee, J. (2021). Understanding user participation behavior in social media platforms: The role of social and emotional factors. Journal of Business Research, 134, 282-292.
Clark, W. (2010). Copyright, ownership, and control of user-generated content on social media websites. Journal of Business & Technology Law, 5(2), 265-284. URL: http://www.kentlaw.edu/perritt/courses/seminar/papers%202009%20fall/Jerry%20clark%20final%20Copyright,%20Ownership,%20and%20Control%20of%20User-Generated%20Content%20on%20Social%20Media%20Websites.pdf
Common, M. F. (2021). Beyond the usual suspects: a taxonomy of social media regulations in countries with human rights issues. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(3), 367-385. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13600869.2022.2043093
DiResta, A. E., & Cohen, D. A. (2019). Social Media Regulation: Advertising, Marketing and the FTC. Holland & Knight Alert. URL: https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2019/11/social-media-regulation-advertising-marketing-and-the-ftc
Happy, H. S., Kim, S., & Kim, M. (2020). Understanding social media usage motivations: A comprehensive model. Telematics and Informatics, 47, 101349.
Hidy, K. M. (2016). Let Them Eat Cake: Social Media Accounts Property Rights, and the Digital Rights Revolution. DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L., 26, 1. URL: https://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4176&context=law-review
Krasavina, E. A., Balakina, E. V., & Malyutina, E. V. (2021). Social networks and mental health: Trends, problems, and prospects. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 14(1), 104-120.
Lee, J., Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2021). Analyzing the Formation of Social Relationships among Followers in Instagram. Sustainability, 13(7), 4103.
Livshits, I., Pivovarov, D., & Shmargad, Y. (2020). Social responsibility of online platform owners. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 35(3), 531-572. https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj/vol35/iss3/3/
Rana, R., Solanki, R., & Solanki, R. (2022). Social Media Regulations: A Comparison of Legal Frameworks in India and the US. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(2), 100398. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361163171_Social_Media_Regulations_A_comparison_of_Legal_Frameworks_in_India_and_the_US
Reinecke, L., & Trepte, S. (2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: Atwo-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias inSNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 95-102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030
Van Dijck, J. (2021). Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2801-2819.
Бурмистрова, О.А. и Чугунова, М.Ю. (2020). Безопасность и защита данных в социальных сетях: проблемы и перспективы. Научно-технический вестник информационных технологий, механики и оптики, 20(5), 877-884. https://doi.org/10.17586/2226-1494-2020-20-5-877-884
