LEGAL RELATIONS AND STAKEHOLDERS IN QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES REGULATION: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORKS

Authors

  • Islombek Abdikhakimov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I8Y2024N55

Keywords:

Quantum technology regulation, Legal relations, Stakeholder governance, Adaptive oversight, International cooperation, Ethical frameworks, Technological innovation, Cybersecurity.

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth examination of the regulatory landscape surrounding quantum technologies, focusing on the types of legal relations and stakeholders involved. It explores the subjects and objects of governance, rights and duties, compliance mechanisms, and the balance between oversight and innovation. The research aims to map the legal topology of this emergent field and provide insights for developing effective regulatory frameworks. The study employs a comprehensive literature review and analysis of existing regulatory approaches, highlighting the complex interplay between various actors in the quantum ecosystem and the challenges of governing exponential technologies.

References

1. Yoo, S. (2022). Politics of technology: Building institutions of humility in the age of AI and Quantum Computers. Ethics and Information Technology.

2. European Commission. (2019). Cybersecurity Act. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/cybersecurity-act

3. Glickman, O. (2022). Upholding human rights in the quantum age. Ethics & International Affairs, 36(2), 201-219.

4. Quantum Industry Coalition. (2023). Voluntary code of ethics for quantum technologies. https://qic.org/ethics-code

5. Henderson, T. (2023). Verifying the verification: Auditing quantum advantage claims. Cryptography Review, 41(7), 983-1002.

6. Montalban, M. (2024). Private quantum oversight: Features, bugs and policy hacks. Policy Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09462-8

7. Intemann, K. (2020). Ensuring oversight does not undermine inquiry: crafting legitimate quantum technology regulations. Philosophy of Science, 87(5), 859-890.

8. Latour, B. (2023). Entangled oversight: Governing quantum relationships. Limn, 12(3), 99-186.

9. Raman, A. & Church, G. (2021). Regulating quantum intrusion: Challenges & approaches. Harvard National Security Journal, 3(2), 55-99.

10. Quantum Industry Coalition. (2023). Voluntary code of ethics for quantum technologies. https://qic.org/ethics-code

11. Gill, K. (2021). Staying with the trouble: An ethics of care approach to quantum governance. Hastings Center Report, 51(1), 34-42.

12. Danaher, J. (2020). Welcoming robots into the moral circle: A defence of ethical behaviourism. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2023-2049.

13. Grace et al. (2018). When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62, 729-754.

14. Raman, A. & Church, G. (2021). Regulating quantum intrusion: Challenges & approaches. Harvard National Security Journal, 3(2), 55-99.

15. Ellis, J. et al. (2022). Updating export controls for quantum software. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05924.

16. penetrate-quantum. (2023). Standard contract for vulnerability disclosure & bug bounties in quantum technologies. https://pen-quantum.org

17. Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79.

18. Zeng, W. et al. (2022). Steering disruptive knowledge: A new mandate for dual use oversight? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 78(2), 102-109.

19. Karinen, R. & Guston, D. H. (2010). Toward anticipatory governance: The experience with nanotechnology. In G. H. Hadorn et al. (Eds.), Governance and sustainability: New challenges for states, companies and civil society (pp. 217-242). Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences.

20. Yoo, S. (2022). Politics of technology: Building institutions of humility in the age of AI and Quantum Computers. Ethics and Information Technology.

21. Unruh, D., & Nunez-Vasquez, F. (2021). Quantum tech: Political capacity in an emerging institutional field. Research Policy, 50(7), 104-252.

22. Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501-507.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31

How to Cite

Abdikhakimov, I. (2024). LEGAL RELATIONS AND STAKEHOLDERS IN QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES REGULATION: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORKS. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 4(8). https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I8Y2024N55