KVANT TEXNOLOGIYALARINI TARTIBGA SOLISHDAGI HUQUQIY MUNOSABATLAR VA MANFAATDOR TOMONLAR: BOSHQARUV TIZIMLARINING KENG QAMROVLI TAHLILI
Kalit so'zlar
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I8Y2024N55Kalit so'zlar
Kvant texnologiyasini tartibga solish, Huquqiy munosabatlar, Manfaatdor tomonlarni boshqarish, Adaptiv nazorat, Xalqaro hamkorlik, Axloqiy asoslar, Texnologik innovatsiyalar, Kiberxavfsizlik.Annotasiya
Ushbu tadqiqot kvant texnologiyalari atrofidagi tartibga soluvchi landshaftni chuqur o'rganishni ta'minlaydi, huquqiy munosabatlar turlari va manfaatdor tomonlarga e'tibor qaratadi. U boshqaruv sub'ektlari va ob'ektlari, huquq va burchlari, rioya qilish mexanizmlari, nazorat va innovatsiyalar o'rtasidagi muvozanatni o'rganadi. Tadqiqot ushbu paydo bo'lgan sohaning huquqiy topologiyasini xaritalash va samarali me'yoriy-huquqiy bazalarni ishlab chiqish uchun tushunchalarni taqdim etishga qaratilgan. Tadqiqotda keng qamrovli adabiyotlarni ko'rib chiqish va mavjud tartibga solish yondashuvlarini tahlil qilish, kvant ekotizimidagi turli aktyorlar o'rtasidagi murakkab o'zaro ta'sir va eksponent texnologiyalarni boshqarish muammolarini yoritadi.
Manbalar
1. Yoo, S. (2022). Politics of technology: Building institutions of humility in the age of AI and Quantum Computers. Ethics and Information Technology.
2. European Commission. (2019). Cybersecurity Act. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/cybersecurity-act
3. Glickman, O. (2022). Upholding human rights in the quantum age. Ethics & International Affairs, 36(2), 201-219.
4. Quantum Industry Coalition. (2023). Voluntary code of ethics for quantum technologies. https://qic.org/ethics-code
5. Henderson, T. (2023). Verifying the verification: Auditing quantum advantage claims. Cryptography Review, 41(7), 983-1002.
6. Montalban, M. (2024). Private quantum oversight: Features, bugs and policy hacks. Policy Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09462-8
7. Intemann, K. (2020). Ensuring oversight does not undermine inquiry: crafting legitimate quantum technology regulations. Philosophy of Science, 87(5), 859-890.
8. Latour, B. (2023). Entangled oversight: Governing quantum relationships. Limn, 12(3), 99-186.
9. Raman, A. & Church, G. (2021). Regulating quantum intrusion: Challenges & approaches. Harvard National Security Journal, 3(2), 55-99.
10. Quantum Industry Coalition. (2023). Voluntary code of ethics for quantum technologies. https://qic.org/ethics-code
11. Gill, K. (2021). Staying with the trouble: An ethics of care approach to quantum governance. Hastings Center Report, 51(1), 34-42.
12. Danaher, J. (2020). Welcoming robots into the moral circle: A defence of ethical behaviourism. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2023-2049.
13. Grace et al. (2018). When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62, 729-754.
14. Raman, A. & Church, G. (2021). Regulating quantum intrusion: Challenges & approaches. Harvard National Security Journal, 3(2), 55-99.
15. Ellis, J. et al. (2022). Updating export controls for quantum software. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05924.
16. penetrate-quantum. (2023). Standard contract for vulnerability disclosure & bug bounties in quantum technologies. https://pen-quantum.org
17. Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79.
18. Zeng, W. et al. (2022). Steering disruptive knowledge: A new mandate for dual use oversight? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 78(2), 102-109.
19. Karinen, R. & Guston, D. H. (2010). Toward anticipatory governance: The experience with nanotechnology. In G. H. Hadorn et al. (Eds.), Governance and sustainability: New challenges for states, companies and civil society (pp. 217-242). Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences.
20. Yoo, S. (2022). Politics of technology: Building institutions of humility in the age of AI and Quantum Computers. Ethics and Information Technology.
21. Unruh, D., & Nunez-Vasquez, F. (2021). Quantum tech: Political capacity in an emerging institutional field. Research Policy, 50(7), 104-252.
22. Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501-507.
