THE EVOLVING LANDSCAPE OF INVESTOR PROTECTION: BALANCING STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND INVESTOR RIGHTS IN THE 21ST CENTURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4SI8Y2024N24Keywords:
investor protection, State sovereignty, International investment law, Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs).Abstract
The evolving landscape of investor protection in the 21st century requires a delicate balance between safeguarding investor rights and preserving state sovereignty. As global investments expand, investors seek legal assurances to protect their assets, while states must retain the ability to regulate in the public interest, addressing economic, social, and environmental challenges. This tension has sparked debates about the role of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms and the need for reform. By modernizing investment treaties and dispute resolution processes, the international community can create a more equitable system that fosters both investment and sustainable development, ensuring mutual benefits for investors and states alike.
References
1. Zugliani N. et al. The Evolving Role of State Sovereignty in the International Investment Regime. – 2021.
2. Lin Y. J. Balancing and sovereignty in international law: Reviewing convergences and divergences in international investment law and trade law : дис. – University of Leicester, 2019.
3. Miles K. Investor-state dispute settlement: conflict, convergence, and future directions //European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016. – 2016. – С. 273-308.
4. Garcia F. J. et al. Rethinking International Investment Governance: Principles for the 21st Century. – 2018.
5. Singh S., Sharma S. Investor-state dispute settlement mechanism: The quest for a workable roadmap //Merkourios-Utrecht J. Int'l & Eur. L. – 2013. – Т. 29. – С. 88.
6. Thrasher R. D., Gallagher K. P. 21st century trade agreements: Implications for development sovereignty //Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y. – 2009. – Т. 38. – С. 313.
7. Ranjan P. Using the public law concept of proportionality to balance investment protection with regulation in international investment law: A critical appraisal //Cambridge International Law Journal. – 2014. – Т. 3. – №. 3. – С. 853-883.
8. VORNICU R., DRAGOȘ D. C. Protecting the environment in investor-state disputes: comparative administrative law as a source for the proportionality test //Revista Română de Drept European. – 2023. – №. 4.
9. Miller S., Hicks G. N. Investor-state dispute settlement: A reality check. – Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.
10. Baetens F. (ed.). Investment law within international law: integrationist perspectives. – Cambridge University Press, 2013.
