ENSURING REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH ENHANCING COMPETITIVENESS AND EXPORT DEVELOPMENT: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL APPROACHES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I1Y2025N13Keywords:
competitive, export, classic, region, marketAbstract
This study examines the theoretical foundations and practical implications of enhancing regional economic competitiveness through export development. Competitiveness, a multifaceted concept, affects economic activity at various levels, from individual firms to entire countries. The study examines the historical evolution of competitiveness, highlighting its roots in classical economic theories and its transition to modern multidimensional frameworks that include productivity, innovation, and market dynamics. Through a comprehensive review of the literature and methodologies, the study identifies key drivers of competitiveness, including infrastructure, public policy, education, and technological progress. Special attention is paid to the contributions of Michael Porter, in particular his "Diamond Model", which emphasizes the interrelationships between factor conditions, demand conditions, relevant industries and firm strategy in supporting competitive advantage.
This study also highlights the important role of export development in enhancing regional economic competitiveness. It argues that focusing on developing internationally competitive products can significantly increase economic activity and job creation, which are essential for long-term sustainability. Export activity enhances market expansion, mitigates the risks associated with domestic market dependence, and contributes to socio-economic development by creating employment opportunities and raising living standards.
References
1. Wziątek-Kubiak A., 2003. Konkurencyjność polskiego przemysłu. Wyd. Bellona, Warszawa.
2. Porter M.E., Rivkin J.W., 2012. The Looming Challenge to U.S. Competitiveness. Harvard Business Review 90 (3), 54–61.
3. Krugman P., 1996. Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12(3), 17–25.
4. Adamkiewicz-Drwiłło H.G., 2002. Uwarunkowania konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstw. PWN, Warszawa
5. Altomonte C., Aquilante T., Ottaviano G.I.P., 2012. The Triggers of Competitiveness. The EFIGE Cross-Country Report. The Bruegel Blueprint Series, Bruegel, Brussels
6. Ajitabh A., Momaya K., 2004. Competitiveness of Firms: Review of Theory, Frameworks and Models. Singapore Management Review 26(1), 45–61
7. Alan, J., Auerbach., Alan, J., Auerbach., Alan, J., Auerbach., James, R., Hines., James, R., Hines. (2001). Perfect Taxation with Imperfect Competition. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.3386/W8138
8. Harald, Trabold. (1994). Technical Progress, Innovation and Product Differentiation in a Ricardian Trade Model with a Continuum of Goods. Research Papers in Economics
9. Svend, Rasmussen. (2013). Economies of Scale and Size. 111-120. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30200-8_11
10. Alan, V., Deardorff. (1998). Benefits and Costs of Following Comparative Advantage. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.113009
11. Alan, P., Kirman. (1975). Learning by Firms about Demand Conditions. 137-156. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-207350-2.50008-7
12. Harry, P., Bowen., Wim, Moesen. (2005). Benchmarking the competitiveness of nations: non-uniform weighting and non-economic dimensions. Research Papers in Economics,
13. Konstantinos, Kostopoulos., Yiannis, E., Spanos., Gregory, P., Prastacos. (2003). The Resource Based View of the Firm and Innovation: Identification of Critical Linkages
14. Anita, Talaja. (2012). Testing VRIN framework: Resource value and rareness as sources of competitive advantage and above average performance. Management : Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 17(2):51-64.
15. Maria, Andersson., Rachel, Ramos-Reid. (2011). Core competence – definition and dynamics in the not : for- profit sector.
16. Aeron, Zentner. (2011). Dynamic Capabilities: A Catalyst to Increase Performance and Gain Competitive Advantage. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.2516600
17. David, W., Stewart. (1996). Managing Market Structure: Achieving Competitive Advantage and Market Dominance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8(1):13-.
18. Emilia, Papulova., Zuzana, Papulová. (2006). Competitive strategy and competitive advantages of small and midsized manufacturing enterprises in slovakia.
19. Hui-Ling, Wang. (2014). Theories for competitive advantage. 33-.
20. Emilia, Papulova., Zuzana, Papulová. (2006). Competitive strategy and competitive advantages of small and midsized manufacturing enterprises in slovakia.
21. David, W., Stewart. (1996). Managing Market Structure: Achieving Competitive Advantage and Market Dominance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8(1):13-.
22. Kimberly, A, Hojecki. (2014). The Effect of Competitiveness on Person Perception: An Experimental Study.
23. Peter, J., Angeline., Jordan, Pollack. (1993). Competitive Environments Evolve Better Solutions for Complex Tasks. 264-270.
24. Edward, S., Conolley., Harold, B., Gerard., Teresa, Kline. (1978). Competitive behavior: A manifestation of motivation for ability comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(1):123-131. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(78)90065-3
25. Saribayevich, X. F., Sariyevich, X. X., Davlatov, S., Turobova, H., & Ruziyev, S. (2024). Analysis of factors affecting CO2 emissions: In the case of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(4), 207-215.
26. Xolmurotov, F. S., Xolmuratov, X. S., & Yakubova, Y. R. (2024). Assessment of the impact of agriculture on the regional socio-economic development. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 548, p. 01003). EDP Sciences.
27. Qodirov, A., Urakova, D., Amonov, M., Masharipova, M., Ibadullaev, E., Xolmurotov, F., & Matkarimov, F. (2024). The Dynamics of Tourism, Economic Growth, and CO2 Emissions in Uzbekistan: An ARDL Approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(6), 365-370.
