RAQOBATBARDOSHLIKNI OSHIRISH VA EKSPORTNI RIVOJLANTIRISH ORQALI MINTAQAVIY IQTISODIY BARQARORLIKNI TAʼMINLASH: NAZARIYA VA AMALIY YONDASHUVLAR
Kalit so'zlar
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I1Y2025N13Kalit so'zlar
raqobatbardosh, eksport, klassik, mintaqa, bozor.Annotasiya
Ushbu tadqiqot eksportni rivojlantirish orqali mintaqaviy iqtisodiy raqobatbardoshlikni oshirishning nazariy asoslari va amaliy oqibatlarini oʻrganadi. Raqobatbardoshlik, koʻp qirrali tushuncha, alohida firmalardan tortib butun davlatlargacha boʻlgan turli darajadagi iqtisodiy faoliyatga taʼsir qiladi. Tadqiqot raqobatbardoshlikning tarixiy evolyutsiyasini oʻrganadi, uning ildizlarini klassik iqtisodiy nazariyalar va unumdorlik, innovatsiyalar va bozor dinamikasini oʻz ichiga olgan zamonaviy koʻp oʻlchovli asoslarga oʻtishini taʼkidlaydi. Adabiyot va metodologiyalarni har tomonlama koʻrib chiqish orqali tadqiqot raqobatbardoshlikni qoʻzgʻatuvchi asosiy omillarni, jumladan, infratuzilma, davlat siyosati, taʼlim va texnologik taraqqiyotni aniqlaydi. Maykl Porterning hissasiga, xususan, raqobatdosh ustunlikni qoʻllab-quvvatlashda omil sharoitlari, talab sharoitlari, tegishli tarmoqlar va firma strategiyasi oʻrtasidagi oʻzaro bogʻliqlikni taʼkidlaydigan “Olmos modeli”ga alohida eʼtibor qaratilgan.
Ushbu tadqiqot mintaqaviy iqtisodiy raqobatbardoshlikni oshirishda eksportni rivojlantirishning muhim rolini ham taʼkidlaydi. Uning taʼkidlashicha, xalqaro miqyosda raqobatbardosh mahsulotlarni ishlab chiqishga eʼtibor qaratish uzoq muddatli barqarorlik uchun zarur boʻlgan iqtisodiy faollikni va ish oʻrinlarini yaratishni sezilarli darajada oshirishi mumkin. Eksport faoliyati bozor kengayishini kuchaytiradi, ichki bozorga qaramlik bilan bogʻliq risklarni yumshatadi va aholi bandligi imkoniyatlarini yaratish va turmush darajasini oshirish orqali ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy rivojlanishga yordam beradi.
Manbalar
1. Wziątek-Kubiak A., 2003. Konkurencyjność polskiego przemysłu. Wyd. Bellona, Warszawa.
2. Porter M.E., Rivkin J.W., 2012. The Looming Challenge to U.S. Competitiveness. Harvard Business Review 90 (3), 54–61.
3. Krugman P., 1996. Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12(3), 17–25.
4. Adamkiewicz-Drwiłło H.G., 2002. Uwarunkowania konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstw. PWN, Warszawa
5. Altomonte C., Aquilante T., Ottaviano G.I.P., 2012. The Triggers of Competitiveness. The EFIGE Cross-Country Report. The Bruegel Blueprint Series, Bruegel, Brussels
6. Ajitabh A., Momaya K., 2004. Competitiveness of Firms: Review of Theory, Frameworks and Models. Singapore Management Review 26(1), 45–61
7. Alan, J., Auerbach., Alan, J., Auerbach., Alan, J., Auerbach., James, R., Hines., James, R., Hines. (2001). Perfect Taxation with Imperfect Competition. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.3386/W8138
8. Harald, Trabold. (1994). Technical Progress, Innovation and Product Differentiation in a Ricardian Trade Model with a Continuum of Goods. Research Papers in Economics
9. Svend, Rasmussen. (2013). Economies of Scale and Size. 111-120. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30200-8_11
10. Alan, V., Deardorff. (1998). Benefits and Costs of Following Comparative Advantage. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.113009
11. Alan, P., Kirman. (1975). Learning by Firms about Demand Conditions. 137-156. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-207350-2.50008-7
12. Harry, P., Bowen., Wim, Moesen. (2005). Benchmarking the competitiveness of nations: non-uniform weighting and non-economic dimensions. Research Papers in Economics,
13. Konstantinos, Kostopoulos., Yiannis, E., Spanos., Gregory, P., Prastacos. (2003). The Resource Based View of the Firm and Innovation: Identification of Critical Linkages
14. Anita, Talaja. (2012). Testing VRIN framework: Resource value and rareness as sources of competitive advantage and above average performance. Management : Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 17(2):51-64.
15. Maria, Andersson., Rachel, Ramos-Reid. (2011). Core competence – definition and dynamics in the not : for- profit sector.
16. Aeron, Zentner. (2011). Dynamic Capabilities: A Catalyst to Increase Performance and Gain Competitive Advantage. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.2516600
17. David, W., Stewart. (1996). Managing Market Structure: Achieving Competitive Advantage and Market Dominance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8(1):13-.
18. Emilia, Papulova., Zuzana, Papulová. (2006). Competitive strategy and competitive advantages of small and midsized manufacturing enterprises in slovakia.
19. Hui-Ling, Wang. (2014). Theories for competitive advantage. 33-.
20. Emilia, Papulova., Zuzana, Papulová. (2006). Competitive strategy and competitive advantages of small and midsized manufacturing enterprises in slovakia.
21. David, W., Stewart. (1996). Managing Market Structure: Achieving Competitive Advantage and Market Dominance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8(1):13-.
22. Kimberly, A, Hojecki. (2014). The Effect of Competitiveness on Person Perception: An Experimental Study.
23. Peter, J., Angeline., Jordan, Pollack. (1993). Competitive Environments Evolve Better Solutions for Complex Tasks. 264-270.
24. Edward, S., Conolley., Harold, B., Gerard., Teresa, Kline. (1978). Competitive behavior: A manifestation of motivation for ability comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(1):123-131. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(78)90065-3
25. Saribayevich, X. F., Sariyevich, X. X., Davlatov, S., Turobova, H., & Ruziyev, S. (2024). Analysis of factors affecting CO2 emissions: In the case of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(4), 207-215.
26. Xolmurotov, F. S., Xolmuratov, X. S., & Yakubova, Y. R. (2024). Assessment of the impact of agriculture on the regional socio-economic development. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 548, p. 01003). EDP Sciences.
27. Qodirov, A., Urakova, D., Amonov, M., Masharipova, M., Ibadullaev, E., Xolmurotov, F., & Matkarimov, F. (2024). The Dynamics of Tourism, Economic Growth, and CO2 Emissions in Uzbekistan: An ARDL Approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(6), 365-370.
