INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ON INTERNET JURISDICTION ISSUES: TRENDS IN LEGAL NORMS UNIFICATION AND PROSPECTS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN'S PARTICIPATION IN GLOBAL REGULATORY MECHANISMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5SI4Y2025N35Keywords:
internet jurisdiction, international cooperation, unification of law, cybercrime, cross-border disputes, Budapest Convention, private international lawAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of international cooperation mechanisms in the field of regulating cross-border Internet relations and the prospects for unification of jurisdictional norms in the global cyberspace. The paper analyzes existing international conventions, regional initiatives, and multilateral projects aimed at resolving jurisdictional conflicts on the Internet. Special attention is paid to the role of international cooperation in overcoming the limitations of national regulation and ensuring effective cross-border law enforcement. Proposals are formulated for the development of international legal mechanisms and enhancing the participation of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the processes of global harmonization of approaches to determining jurisdiction in cyberspace.
References
1. Council of Europe. (2001). Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention), ETS No.185. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/185
2. Council of Europe. (2016). Global Views on Internet Jurisdiction and Trans-Border Access. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/publications
3. Hörnle, J. (2018). Internet Jurisdiction Law and Practice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198806929.001.0001
4. Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. (2019). Ottawa Roadmap on Jurisdiction in the Internet. https://www.internetjurisdiction.net/uploads/pdfs/Secretariat-Summary-and-Ottawa-Roadmap-second-Global-Conference-of-the-Internet-Jurisdiction-Policy-Network.pdf
5. Internet Society. (2018). The Internet and Extra-Territorial Effects of Laws. Internet Society Policy Brief. https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2018/internet-and-extra-territorial-application-of-laws/
6. Koops, B-J., & Brenner, S. (Eds.). (2006). Cybercrime and Jurisdiction: A Global Survey. T.M.C. Asser Press. https://core.ac.uk/download/187790105.pdf
7. Неъматов Жасур Аминжанович, Зокирова Нодира Каландаровна, Еникеева Алсу Гумеровна, & Таиров Санжар Октамович (2020). Проблемы нормативно-правового регулирования применения информационно-коммуникационных технологий в Республике Узбекистан и пути их решения. Журнал прикладных исследований, (1), 40-46.Svantesson, D. J. (2016). Internet jurisdiction: today and in the future. Precedent, 132, 4-9. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509902538
8. UNODC. (2024, August 9). Press Release: Member States finalize a new cybercrime convention. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/press/releases/2024/August/member-states-finalize-new-cybercrime-convention.html
