ECOLOGICAL THINKING AND GREEN ECONOMY AS A NEW PHILOSOPHICAL PARADIGM OF THE THIRD RENAISSANCE

Authors

  • Xakimaxon Muxiddinova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I10Y2025N42

Keywords:

Third Renaissance, ecological thinking, green economy, socio-philosophical foundations, sustainable development, ecological consciousness, spiritual revival, ecological responsibility.

Abstract

This article analyzes the philosophical essence of the Third Renaissance and its role in the formation of ecological thinking. The study discusses the restoration of harmony between humans and nature, the enhancement of ecological responsibility, and the socio-philosophical foundations of the green economy concept. The model of the green economy is presented as one of the core principles of the Third Renaissance, expressing the unity of sustainable development, spiritual revival, and ecological consciousness. The article explores the emergence of a new philosophical paradigm of human thought at the intersection of philosophy, ecology, and social sciences.

References

1. Шмелев, С. Green Economy Reader: Lectures in Ecological Economics and Sustainability. – Springer, 2017. – 563 p.

2. Якобсен, О. Transformative Ecological Economics: Process Philosophy, Ideology and Utopia. – London: Routledge, 2019. – 248 p.

3. Дэйл, Г., Матай, М. В., де Оливейра, Ж. А. П. Green Growth: Ideology, Political Economy and the Alternatives. – London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. – 368 p.

4. Jo‘rayev, A., Xo‘jayev, B. Barqaror rivojlanish va ekologik xavfsizlik. – Toshkent: Fan, 2018. – 220 b.

5. Tursunov, M., To‘laganova, G. Ekologik tafakkur va yashil iqtisodiyot asoslari. – Toshkent: Iqtisod-Moliya, 2022. – 198 b.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-10-11

Published

2025-10-12

How to Cite

Muxiddinova, X. (2025). ECOLOGICAL THINKING AND GREEN ECONOMY AS A NEW PHILOSOPHICAL PARADIGM OF THE THIRD RENAISSANCE. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 5(10), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I10Y2025N42