FORMULALI IFODALARGA NAZARIY YONDASHUVLAR VA QARASHLAR
Kalit so'zlar
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I12Y2025N65Kalit so'zlar
formulali til; frazeologiya; til nazariyasi; kognitiv lingvistika; psixolingvistika; leksik ishlov berish; tayyor shakllar; lingvistik tuzilma.Annotasiya
Formulali til uzoq yillardan beri empirik va nazariy jihatdan tan olingan hodisa bo‘lib, har qanday tilning eng struktural jihatdan muhim jihatlaridan biridir. Ushbu hodisani o‘rganishga qilingan avvalgi urinishlar formulali ifodaning hajmi, taksonomik darajalari va lingvistik darajasi bo‘yicha aniqlik va metodologik muammolarga duch kelgan. Ushbu tadqiqot til tuzilishi doirasida asosiy nazariyalarni – strukturaviy, kognitiv va psixolingvistik yondashuvlarni – tahlil qilib, formulali tilni yaxshiroq tushunishga va formulali ketma-ketliklarni tilning barqaror va uyg‘un shakllari sifatida ko‘rib chiqishga urinadi. Frazeologiyaning mohiyatiga, tilni ishlatishga yo‘naltirilgan tahlillarga va psixolingvistika subdisiplinasiga murojaat qilgan holda, tadqiqot formulali ifodalarni saqlash, chaqirish, semantik yaxlitlik va belgilangan funksiyasini tahlil qiladi. Tadqiqot shuni ko‘rsatadiki, formulali ifodalar leksikonning markaziy tashkiliy mexanizmini tashkil etadi va til foydalanuvchisiga ravonlik, ishlov berish samaradorligi, diskurs uyg‘unligi va til ijodkorligini ta’minlaydi. Bu esa shakl va ma’no o‘rtasidagi o‘zaro bog‘liqlik yaxshiroq tushunilsa, formulali ifodalarning aqliy tasvirini yanada yaxshiroq tushunishga yordam berishini ko‘rsatadi.
Manbalar
1. Abdulkhakova Dilafruz Shamsiddinovna. (2025). PSYCHOLINGUISTIC INSIGHTS INTO THE PROCESSING AND ACQUISITION OF FORMULAIC LANGUAGE IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17258875
2. Abdulkhakova, D. S. (2025, November 1). "PHATIC GLUE" ACROSS DISCOURSES IN FORMULAS OF GREETING AND FAREWELL IN ENGLISH. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17500375
3. Altenberg B. On the phraseology of spoken English: the evidence of recurrent word combinations. In: Cowie AP, editor. Phraseology. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998. p. 101–24.
4. Ashurova D.U., Galieva M.R. Cognitive Linguistics. – Tashkent: VneshInvestProm, 2018.
5. Ashurova D.U., Galiyeva M.R. Cultural Linguistics. – Tashkent, 2019. – 138 p.
6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
7. Code, C. (2005). First in, last out? The evolution of aphasic lexical speech automatisms to agrammatism and the evolution of human communication. Interaction Studies, 6, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29-62
9. Foster, P. (2001). Rules & routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P.Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 75-94). London, New York: Longman.
10. Howarth, P. (1998). The phraseology of learners’ academic writing. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications (pp. 161-186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Jiang N, Nekrsova TM. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. The Modern Language J 2007;91(3):433–45.
12. Kristi, A. (2022). Ubiystvo v Mesopotamii (L. A. Devel & A. A. Devel, Per.). Eksmo.
13. Molotkov, A. I. (1977). Osnovy frazeologii russkogo yazyka [Fundamentals of the Russian language phraseology]. Leningrad: Nauka. P. 284.
14. Moon R. Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; 1998a.
15. Moon R. Vocabulary connections: Multi-word items in English. In: McCarthy M, editor. Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 40–63.
16. Moon RE. Frequencies and forms of phrasal lexemes in English. In: Cowie AP, editor. Phraseology. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998b. p. 79–100.
17. Oppenheim, N. (2000). The importance of recurrent sequences for non-native speaker fluency and cognition. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 220-240). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. Oybek. (1969). Qutlug‘ qon. G‘afur G‘ulom nomidagi Badiiy adabiyot nashriyoti.
References
19. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan
20. Schmitt, N. (Ed.). (2004). Formulaic sequences. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins
21. Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use (pp. 1-22). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Press
22. Sinclair JM. Corpus concordance collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991
23. Sorhus, H. B. (1977). To hear ourselves-implications for teaching English as a second language. English Language Teaching Journal, XXXI(3), 211–221.
24. Wood, D. (2015). Fundamentals of formulaic language. Bloomsbury Publishing. P 192.
