ISSUES OF OPTIMAL TAX BURDEN AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Otajon Otabekov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SP1342V3I12.1Y2023N36

Keywords:

Tax burden, optimal tax theory, economic growth, tax burden targeting, state size.

Abstract

The role of taxes in the national economy, the state financial situation and one of the main indicators of budget revenue management is the tax burden. With the help of the tax burden indicator, it is possible to get a preliminary idea of the government's involvement in the economy and the size of the state as a whole. According to official data, the tax burden (ratio of the consolidated budget to GDP) in the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2022 was 29 percent, and the ratio of state budget revenues to GDP (tax burden without targeted funds) was 21.7 percent. According to the results of calculations, the optimal (growth-maximizing) level of the tax burden in Uzbekistan is 20%-22%, and the optimal level of the tax burden without targeted funds is 18%-20%. Targeting the tax burden at this level increases annual economic growth by an average of 0.5%.

References

Anago SSF (2015) Croissance économique au Bénin : Une analyse à partir d’un modèle A seuil Stochastique. Revue d’Analyse des politiques économiques et financières Volume 1 - Numéro 1 Août 2015, pp 106-159

Arrow, Kenneth, and Gerard Debreu. 1954. Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica 22: 265–90.

Barro R J (1990) Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, S103–S125

Chelliah, Raja, Baas Hessel, and Margaret Kelly. 1975. Tax Ratios and Tax E_ort in Developing Countries, 1969–1971. IMF Economic Review 22: 187–205.

Crivelli, Ernesto, and Sanjeev Gupta. 2014. Resource Blessing, Revenue Curse? Domestic Revenue Effort in Resource-Rich Countries. IMFWorking Paper, WP/14/5, International Monetary Fund,Washington, DC, USA.

Cyan, Musharraf, Martiez-Vazquez Jorge, and Violeta Vulovic. 2013. Measuring Tax E_ort: Does the Estimation Approach Matter and Should E_ort be Linked to Expenditure Goals? Working Paper Series 39. Atlanta: International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

Hill R (2008) Optimal Taxation and Economic Growth: A Comment. Public Choice, Vol. 134, No. 3-4, pp. 419-427

Johansson A, Heady C, Arnold J, Brys B, Vartia L (2008) Taxation and Economic Growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 620

Kaplow, Louis (2008a). The Theory of Taxation and Public Economics. Princeton University Press.

Katz CJ, Mahler .A, Franz MG (1983) The Impact of Taxes on growth and distribution in developed capitalist countries: A Cross-national study. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 871-886

Keho Y (2010) Détermination d’un Taux de Pression Fiscale optimal en Côte d’Ivoire. Bulletin de Politique Économique et de Développement n° 04

Keynes, J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan and Co., London.

Laffer A B (1981) Supply-Side Economics. Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 37, No. 5, September-October, pp. 29-44

Levine, R. and Renelt, D.A. (1992), “Sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 82 No. 4, pp. 942-963.

Mankiw, N. Gregory and Matthew Weinzierl (2008). "The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution." Forthcoming, American Economic Journals: Economic Policy.

Myles GD (2000) Taxation and Economic Growth. Fiscal Studies, Vol. 21, No.1 (March), pp. 141-168

Myles GD (2009) Economic Growth and The Role of Taxation: Aggregate Data. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No.714

Pessino, Carola, and Ricardo Fenochietto. 2010. Determining countries’ tax e_ort. Hacienda Pública Española 195: 65–87.

Rodrik, D. (1998), “Why do more open economies have bigger governments?”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 106 No. 5, pp. 997-1032.

Romer CD, Romer DH (2007) The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks. NBER Working Paper, No. 13264, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research

Scully G W (2000) The Growth-Maximizing Tax Rate. Pacific Economic Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, pages 93-96

Scully GW (1995) The Growth Tax in the United States. Public Choice, Vol. 85, No. 1/2 (October) pp. 71–80

Scully GW (1996) Taxation and Economic Growth in New Zealand. Pacific Economic Review, Vol. 1, No.2, pp. 169–177

Scully GW (1998) Measuring the Burden of High Taxes. National Center for Policy Analysis, Policy Report No. 215, July

Scully GW (2003) Optimal Taxation, Economic Growth and Income Inequality. Public Choice, Vol. 115, No. 3/4 (June) pp. 299–312

Stotsky, Janet Gale, and AsegedechWoldeMariam. 1997. Tax E_ort in sub-Saharan Africa. IMFWorking Paper, WP/97/107, International Monetary Fund,Washington, DC, USA.

IMF: Uzbekistan`s inflation ranges at some 20% (no date) UzReport.news. Available at: https://uzreport.news/economy/imf-uzbekistans-inflation-ranges-at-some-20-

https://lex.uz/docs/-5841063

Published

2024-01-05

How to Cite

Otabekov, O. (2024). ISSUES OF OPTIMAL TAX BURDEN AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари / Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук / Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 3(12/1). https://doi.org/10.47390/SP1342V3I12.1Y2023N36