COGNITIVE APPROACH TO TRANSLATING METAPHORS INTO UZBEK LANGUAGE

Authors

  • Aziza Faizieva
  • Nigora Safarova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I2Y2024N21

Keywords:

cognitive linguistics, metaphors, pragmatics, cognitive coherence in translation.

Abstract

The article discusses the interpretation of metaphors in cognitive linguistics. Metaphors are the art of describing the body, reality, matter in different words, and its roots go back to ancient times, changes as a result of political processes. Over the centuries, interest in metaphors has waned somewhat, as scholars have long viewed metaphors as simply describing an object, event, or reality under another name. But by the 20th century, after the anthropocentric approach to linguistic phenomena became widespread, a pragmatic, linguistic, and generally cognitive approach to metaphors was required among all aspects of language. The article discusses the opinions and views of scientists and researchers who lived in different eras regarding metaphors. At the same time, some metaphors are cognitively analyzed and the question of how to choose equivalents to represent them in translation is discussed.

References

Alex Gomez-Marin.General Commentary: Metaphors We Live By. 29 June 2022. Alicante, Spain . doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2022.890531

Andrew Ortony. “Metaphor and Thought”. Published by the Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2

Aristotle. 1954. Rhetoric. (Trans. by Rhys Roberts). New York: The Modern

Attila Imre. Metaphors in Cognitive Linguistics.Eger Journal of English Studies X (2010) 71–81

Brugman C. 1981. Story of Over. MA thesis. Berkeley: University of California. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Chomsky N. 1972. Language and Mind. Enlarged ed. New York, MIT: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Cooper D. 1986. Metaphor. Oxford: Blackwell.

Elisabeth Camp. Metaphor And That Certain “Je Ne Sais Quoi”. Philosophical Studies (2006) 129:1-25 _ Springer 2006 DOI 10.1007/s11098-005-3019-5

Elisabeth Camp. Metaphor in the Mind: The Cognition of Metaphor1.

George Lakoff, Mark Johnson. The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System. Cognitive Science 4, 195-208 (1980)

George Lakoff. 2005. The Brains Concepts: The Role of the Sensory –Mtor System in Conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsycology, 22 (3/4), 455–479.

Kövecses Z. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff G., Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, completed with an Afterword in 2003.

Lakoff George. Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. 1980-08-01. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8)

Levin, S. R. (1977). The Semantic of metaphor. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press

Martin J.R.Metaphors we feel by: stratal tension. Journal of World Languages. 2020, VOL. 6, NOS. 1–2, 8–26 https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2020.1720158

Michiel Leezenberg. 2012. From Cognitive Linguistics to Social Science: Thirty Years after Metaphors We Live By. University of Amsterdam

Mittelberg, I., Farmer, T.A., & Waugh, L.R. 2007. They actually said that? An introduction to working with usage data through discourse and corpus analysis. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. coulson & M. J. Spivey (eds.) Methods in Cognitive Lingvistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 20-52

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Faizieva, A., & Safarova, N. (2024). COGNITIVE APPROACH TO TRANSLATING METAPHORS INTO UZBEK LANGUAGE. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари / Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук / Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 4(2). https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I2Y2024N21