THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN COLLECTING DIGITAL EVIDENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I12Y2025N78Keywords:
digital evidence, international organizations, cybercrime, digital forensics, international cooperation, Budapest Convention.Abstract
The rapid development of digital technologies has led to the emergence of new forms of criminal activity, making the collection of digital evidence a crucial component of modern criminal proceedings. This research is focused on analyzing the role and significance of international organizations in the field of digital evidence collection. The article examines international cooperation mechanisms, standardization processes, and the activities of international organizations in the sphere of digital forensics. According to the research findings, international organizations play an important role in developing digital evidence collection standards, creating interstate information exchange mechanisms, and training specialists. Measures implemented by organizations such as the Budapest Convention and Interpol are enhancing the effectiveness of international cooperation in digital evidence collection.
References
1. Cybersecurity Ventures. (2023). Global Cybercrime Damages Report. Cybersecurity Market Report Series.
2. Casey, E. (2011). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet. Academic Press, p. 5.
3. Council of Europe. (2020). Digital Evidence and International Cooperation: International Standards and Best Practices. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
4. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining "Kibertahdidsizlikni ta'minlash konseptsiyasini tasdiqlash to'g'risida"gi 2021-yil 5-iyuldagi PF-6241-son Farmoni.
5. Europol. (2023). European Cybercrime Centre Annual Report 2023. The Hague: Europol.
6. Erkinov, M., Abdullayev, D. (2022). Kiberjinoyatchilikga qarshi kurashning dolzarb masalalari. Toshkent: O'zbekiston yuristlari uyushmasi nashri.
7. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime. New York: United Nations.
8. Council of Europe. (2024). Chart of Signatures and Ratifications of Treaty 185. Status as of 15 January 2024.
9. Council of Europe. (2001). Explanatory Report to the Convention on Cybercrime. European Treaty Series No. 185, Articles 14-21.
10. INTERPOL. (2023). INTERPOL Global Complex for Innovation Annual Report 2023. Singapore: INTERPOL.
11. Europol. (2024). EC3 Operational Highlights 2023. The Hague: European Cybercrime Centre.
12. United Nations General Assembly. (2021). Resolution 75/282: Countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes. UN Doc. A/RES/75/282.
13. European Data Protection Board. (2020). Guidelines 2/2020 on Articles 46(2)(a) and 46(3)(b) of Regulation 2016/679 for transfers of personal data between EEA and non-EEA public authorities and bodies.
14. International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO/IEC 27037:2012 Information technology — Security techniques — Guidelines for identification, collection, acquisition and preservation of digital evidence.
15. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Ichki ishlar vazirligi matbuot xizmati. (2023). Kiberjinoyatlarga qarshi kurashishda xalqaro hamkorlik. Toshkent.
16. Council of Europe. (2023). GLACY+ Project Progress Report 2023. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
17. INTERPOL. (2024). I-24/7 Global Police Communications System: 2023 Statistics Report. Lyon: INTERPOL General Secretariat.
18. Kholmatov, Sh. (2023). Raqamli dalillarning sud jarayonidagi ahamiyati. "Huquq va burch" jurnali, 3-son, 45-52 betlar.
19. Karimov, A., Rashidov, B. (2024). O'zbekistonda kibertahdidsizlik tizimini takomillashtirish yo'llari. "Jamiyat va boshqaruv" ilmiy jurnali, 1-son, 78-85 betlar.
