SCHOOLS OF TRADITIONAL TERMINOLOGY

Authors

  • Dilshodakhan Rakhimjonova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SP1342V3SI3Y2023N22

Keywords:

terminology, schools of terminology, Soviet school, Prague school, Vienna school, stages of development of terminology, D. Lotte, E. Wuster.

Abstract

This article discusses the stages of the formation of terminology as a science, traditional schools of terminology, and their differences. Terminology is viewed as a set of special concepts, which represent a categorical apparatus specific to different schools, scientific directions, and specific ideas, combined into a system of terms. If the scientific and technical terms in each language are considered from the linguistic point of view, these terms form one of the terminological systems of the language. Terminology can be interpreted as a science that studies the collection, definition, formation, and presentation of lexical units related to a special field, that is, terms in one or more languages. In addition, the article emphasizes that the accuracy and orderliness of the terminology of a certain field of science serve to show the level of education and scientific culture of that nation.

References

Cabré, M.T. Terminology: Theory, Methods, and Applications.

Dadaboyev H., “O‘ZBEK TERMINOLOGIYASI”.-Toshkent: YOSHLAR NASHRIYOT UYI, 2019.

Dilshoda, R. (2022). THE STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC FEATURES OF COMPUTER TERMS IN ENGLISH LINGUISTICS. PEDAGOGS jurnali, 20(2), 36-40.

D Raximjonova, TERMIN LINGVISTIKANING O‘RGANISH OBYEKTI SIFATIDA. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: PROBLEMS AND SCIENTIFIC SOLUTIONS. 2 (8), 208-213.

H.Dadaboyev, “O‘zbek leksikografiyasi va terminologiyasi”. O‘quv-uslubiy majmua. Toshkent, 2016

Ibrohim Yo‘ldoshev, O‘lmas Sharipova. Tilshunoslik asoslari.- T., 2007.

Ivana Bozdĕchová , Prague School of Terminology,-Charles University, Prague

Levická, J./ M. Zumrík, Finding one’s way: the case of Slovak terminology (general overview from 1844 onwards)

M. Teresa Cabré. La Terminolgia. La teoria, els mètodes, les aplicacions. Barcelona, Emúries 1992.

Qoshg‘ariy M. Devonu lug‘atit turk. T.I. -Toshkent: Fan, 1960.-B.214-215.

Raximjonova, D. (2022). INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK TILLARIDA KOMPOZITSIYA USULIDA SO‘Z YASALISHI HODISASINING O‘ZIGA XOS XUSUSIYATLARI. Journal of Integrated Education and Research, 1(4), 710-713.

Sager, J.C. 1990. A practical course in terminology processing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.44

Sager, J. C. 1998/99. "In search of a foundation: Towards a theory of the term," Terminology 5(1), B. 41-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/term.5.1.05sag

Sager, J.C. 1997. Term formation. In Handbook of terminology management: Basic aspects of terminology, vol. 1, comp. S.E. Wright and G. Budin, 25 – 41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm1.06sag

Terminology Science in Russia today: From the Past to the Future. Edited by Larissa A. Manerko, Klaus-Dieter Baumann, Hartwig Kalverkämper. Frank and Timme Ed., 2014.

Tursunov U., O‘rinboyev B. O‘zbek adabiy tili tarixi.-Toshkent: “O‘qituvchi”, 1982. B. 84-85.

V.M. Leitchik, S.D. Shelov, Terminology: Where is Russian Science Today?-LSP&Professional communication Volume 3, Number 1, April 2003, ISSN 1601-1929.

Wüster, E. (1974), Die allgemeine Terminologielehre, ein Grenzgebiet zwischen Sprachwissenschaft, Logik, Ontologie, Informatik und den Sachwissenschaften. In: “Linguistics” 12 (119), 61–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1974.12.119.61

Published

2023-05-19

How to Cite

Rakhimjonova, D. (2023). SCHOOLS OF TRADITIONAL TERMINOLOGY. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари / Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук / Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 3(S/3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.47390/SP1342V3SI3Y2023N22