PARTICIPATION OF LAWYERS IN ECONOMIC AND CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN AND NATIONAL LEGISLATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I1Y2026N24Keywords:
attorney, economic litigation, civil litigation, judge, judicial protection, procedural guarantees, legislation.Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive legal analysis of the participation of lawyers in economic and civil proceedings based on a comparative study of foreign experience and the national legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The research examines in detail the procedural status of lawyers, their rights and obligations, as well as their role in ensuring the protection of the rights and lawful interests of the parties. In particular, the article analyzes the practice of developed foreign countries, where the participation of lawyers in judicial proceedings is mandatory, their professional independence is guaranteed, and high professional standards are applied, and compares these approaches with the norms of national legislation. The article scientifically substantiates that the participation of lawyers in economic and civil cases is an important factor in ensuring the legality, validity, and fairness of judicial decisions. In addition, certain problems of the current legislation are identified and analyzed, including the limited scope of lawyers’ powers and the недостаточность (insufficiency) of procedural guarantees for their activities. Based on the results of the study, scientifically grounded conclusions and proposals are formulated aimed at improving national legislation, expanding the procedural capabilities of lawyers, and increasing the effectiveness of judicial protection.
References
1. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Иқтисодий процессуал кодекси.
2. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Фуқаролик процессуал кодекси.
3. Ўзбекистон Республикаси “Адвокатлик фаолиятининг кафолатлари ва адвокатларнинг ижтимоий ҳимояси тўғрисида”ги Қонуни.
4. Cappelletti M. & B. Garth — Access to Justice – Oxford Academic / NCJRS Virtual Library. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/access-justice-vol-2-promising-institutions?
5. Тимошенко А. А., Хашаева Д. А. ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНАЯ РОЛЬ АДВОКАТА В ГРАЖДАНСКОМ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ // Научные высказывания. 2024. №9 (56). С. 70-73. УРЛ: ҳттпс://нвжоурнал.ру/артиcле/ПРОЦЕССУАЛНАЖа_РОЛ_АДВОКАТА_В_ГРАЗҳДАНСКОМ_СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ
6. Zuckerman A. A. S (ed.), Reform of Civil Procedure: Essays on ‘Access to Justice’ — Oxford University Press (Clarendon Press, 1995). https://academic.oup.com/book/50736?__cf_chl_tk=7zlPSG_hdQPPMqrUk99ZAQHWiGqbHYIpCE.o0MOJoh4-1767018705-1.0.1.1-ж82д85бҲОп1ВслокОдвомаКЕжПмЙв9и6ГЙБХРВвТ3КА
7. Ўзбекистон Республикасида адвокатлик фаолияти. Муаллифлар жамоаси // Масъул муҳаррирлар М.Х.Рустамбоев., Б.Саломов. Дарслик. ИИ жилд. – Т: Консаудитинформ нашриёти, 2007. – 469 б.
8. Отахонов Ф.Х. Юридик хизматнинг назарий-ҳуқуқий муаммолари Монография. – Т.: 2019. – 290 б.
9. Иқтисодий процессуал ҳуқуқ. Дарслик. Муаллифлар жамоаси // Масъул муҳаррир З.Н.Эсанова. – Т: ТДЮУ нашриёти, 2018. – 518 б.
10. Қодиралиев С.Б. Адвокатура институтининг ташкилий-ҳуқуқий масалалари. Ўқув қўлланма. – Т: ТДЮУ нашриёти, 2023. – 193 б.
11. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_37800/
12. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2023 title28/html/USCODE-2023-title28-partV-chap11
13. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil
