GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR REGULATING INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS THROUGH VIDEOCONFERENCING IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LEGISLATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6SI1Y2026N35Keywords:
videoconferencing, investigative actions, remote interrogation, Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, digitalization of criminal procedure, procedural guarantees, electronic fixation of evidence, videoconferencing mode.Abstract
The article examines the general conditions and legal foundations for conducting investigative actions (interrogation, confrontation, identification of persons and objects, etc.) via videoconferencing in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Particular attention is paid to the provisions of Articles 91¹–91⁴ of the CPC of Uzbekistan, introduced by Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. LRU-542 dated May 23, 2019. The study analyzes the grounds for the application of videoconferencing, as well as provides a detailed examination of the procedural requirements governing its use. Special emphasis is placed on practical application issues, including technical security and reliability of communication, guarantees of participants’ rights, authenticity of evidence obtained remotely, and compliance with the principles of immediacy and adversarial proceedings in criminal procedure. In addition, the author formulates proposals and recommendations for further improvement of the normative regulation of videoconferencing in criminal proceedings.
References
1. Jinoyat-protsessual huquqi. Darslik. Mualliflar jamoasi. – Toshkent: Yuridik adabiyotlar publish, 2024-y. – 648 bet. (M.X.Rustamboyevning umumiy tahriri ostida).
2. Mirenskiy B.A., O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat protsessi. Darslik. Toshkent – 2012.
3. Tulaganova G.Z., Bazarova D.B., Uralov S.S., Maxmudov S.A. “Jinoyat-protsessual huquqi” fanidan o‘quv qo‘llanma.- Toshkent: TDYU nashriyoti.. 2021 y.-342 bet.
4. Khamitovna K. M. Criminal procedural terms in the republic of Uzbekistan //Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR). – 2020. – Т. 9. – №. 2. – С. 280-287. Toshkent – 2020. – 15 b.
5. Короленко И.И. Актуальные проблемы уголовного процесса. –Ростов-наДону. 2017. – С. 20
6. Наумов К.А. Сущность и построение досудебного производства в уголовном процессе России. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата юридических наук. - Омск 2021. –С.39
7. Уралов S. 2024. Некоторые вопросы реализации института преюдиции в уголовно-процессуальном законодательстве Республики Узбекистан. Общество и инновации. 5, 2/S (фев. 2024), 62–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol5-iss2/S-pp62-65.
