MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTING PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING MODEL IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION LEADERS

Authors

  • Shukhrat Ismailov
  • Majid Innazarov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I3Y2026N54

Keywords:

performance-based funding, leadership personnel, higher education, performance indicators, evaluation system, institutional development.

Abstract

This article analyzes the main mechanisms for implementing the performance-based funding (PBF) model in the professional development system of higher education institution leaders, examines international experience, and provides practical recommendations.

References

1. Burke J.C. (ed.) Fixing the Fragmented University: Decentralization with Direction. — Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing, 2005. — 312 p.

2. Dougherty K.J., Jones S.M., Lahr H., Natow R.S., Pheatt L., Reddy V. Performance Funding for Higher Education. — Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016. — 280 p.

3. Dougherty K.J., Reddy V. The Impacts of State Performance Funding Systems on Higher Education Institutions: Research Literature Review and Policy Recommendations. — New York: CCRC, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2011. — 68 p.

4. Frølich N., Schmidt E.K., Rosa M.J. Funding systems for higher education and their impacts on institutional strategies and academia // International Journal of Educational Management. — 2010. — Vol. 24. — No. 1. — Pp. 7–21.

5. Fullan M., Scott G. Turnaround Leadership for Higher Education. — San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009. — 160 p.

6. Hillman N., Tandberg D., Gross J. Performance Funding in Higher Education: Do Financial Incentives Impact College Completion? // Journal of Higher Education. — 2014. — Vol. 85. — No. 6. — Pp. 826–857.

7. Hood C. A Public Management for All Seasons? // Public Administration. — 1991. — Vol. 69. — No. 1. — Pp. 3–19.

8. McLendon M.K., Hearn J.C., Deaton R. Called to Account: Analyzing the Origins and Spread of State Performance-Accountability Policies for Higher Education // Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. — 2006. — Vol. 28. — No. 1. — Pp. 1–24.

9. Muller J.Z. The Tyranny of Metrics. — Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018. — 256 p.

10. Rutherford A., Rabovsky T. Evaluating Impacts of Performance Funding Policies on Student Outcomes in Higher Education // The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. — 2014. — Vol. 655. — No. 1. — Pp. 185–208.

11. Spendlove M. Competencies for effective leadership in higher education // International Journal of Educational Management. — 2007. — Vol. 21. — No. 5. — Pp. 407–417.

12. Tandberg D.A., Hillman N.W. State Higher Education Performance Funding: Data, Outcomes, and Policy Implications // Journal of Education Finance. — 2014. — Vol. 39. — No. 3. — Pp. 222–243.

13. Välimaa J. The Finnish higher education system: organisation, management and governance // Higher Education Management and Policy. — 2012. — Vol. 24. — No. 1. — Pp. 77–94.

14. Zumeta W., Breneman D.W., Callan P.M., Finney J.E. Financing American Higher Education in the Era of Globalization. — Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2012. — 296 p.

Submitted

2026-03-15

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Ismailov, S., & Innazarov, M. (2026). MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTING PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING MODEL IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION LEADERS. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 6(3), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I3Y2026N54