HUMOUR AS COGNITIVE–PRAGMATIC SCRIPT OPPOSITION: AN INTEGRATIVE LINGUISTIC MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6SI3Y2026N17Ключевые слова:
humour, script opposition, pragmatics, discourse analysis, affective violation, GTVH, linguistic model.Аннотация
The article examines humour as a multidimensional cognitive-pragmatic phenomenon. Drawing upon classical philosophical insights, semantic script theory, and affective violation models, the study proposes an integrative framework explaining humour as simultaneous activation of opposing scripts under conditions of benign violation. The analysis synthesizes Aristotle’s concept of homo ridens, Veatch’s violation–normality theory, and Attardoʻs General Theory of Verbal Humor. It is argued that humour emerges at the intersection of semantic opposition, affective ambivalence, pragmatic framing, and social positioning. The study contributes to linguistic pragmatics by offering a structured four-layer model applicable to verbal humour across discourse types.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Aristotle. (n.d.). De partibus animalium.
2. Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: Norton.
4. Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London.
5. Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. London: Academic Press.
6. Morreall, J. (2009). Comic relief: A comprehensive philosophy of humor. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
7. Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.
8. Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11(2), 161–215.
9. Ordóñez, V. (n.d.). Aristotle’s homo ridens.





