PROCEDURAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF APPEALING COURT DECISIONS THAT HAVE NOT ENTERED INTO LEGAL FORCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I4Y2026N36Keywords:
appeal, appeal complaint, appellate protest, court of first instance, judicial act not entered into legal force, civil procedure, procedural foundations, time limit for filing a complaint, restoration of a missed deadline, procedural requirements, prosecutor’s protest, representative’s authority, state duty, electronic document, legality of a judicial act.Abstract
This article analyzes the procedural and legal foundations for appealing judicial acts that have not
entered into legal force in the appellate procedure. The article reveals the essence and content of the institution of
appeal, its place and significance in civil proceedings, as well as the specific features of full and incomplete appeal.
In addition, it examines in detail the range of subjects entitled to file an appeal complaint or prosecutorial protest,
the procedure and time limits for filing a complaint, the grounds for restoring a missed deadline, the requirements
imposed on the form and content of the complaint, the attached documents, the powers of a representative, the
prosecutor’s protest, the state duty, as well as issues related to filing in electronic form. The author evaluates the
institution of appeal as an important procedural guarantee for eliminating factual and legal errors that may be
committed by the court of first instance, ensuring a lawful and well-grounded judicial act, and effectively
protecting the rights and legitimate interests of persons.
References
1. Васьковский Е. В. Курс гражданского процесса. Т. 1. С. 182.
2. Малышев К. И. Курс гражданского судопроизводства. Т. 2. С. 77.
3. Гольмстен А. Х. Учебник русского гражданского судопроизводства. СПб., 1913.
4. Михайлов С. М. Оценка доказательств судом второй инстанции в гражданском
судопроизводстве: автореф. дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. М., 2001. С. 19.
5. Борисова Е.А. Апелляция, кассация, надзор по гражданским делам: учеб. пособие /
Е.А.Борисова. — 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. — М.:Норма : ИНФРА-М, 2024. с.186
6. Lorenz M. Über die volle Berufung im deutschen und beschränkte Berufung im
österreichischen Zivilprozeßrecht // Zeitschrift für Deutschen Zivilprozeß. Bd. 65. 1952
(Heft 3). S. 170. Это журнал немецкого гражданского процесса (т. 65, 1952 г., часть
3).
7. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksiga sharhlar. -Toshkent:
TDYuI nashryoti, 2010. – 780 bet.
8. Egamberdiev E. Sud hal qiluv qarorlari, ajrim va qarorlarining qonuniyligi va
asoslantirilganligini tekshirish: Oʻquv qoʻllanma. – Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi IIV
Akademiyasi. – T., 2016. -24 bet.
9. “Гражданский процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации” от 14.11.2002 N
138-ФЗ (ред. от 30.12.2021) (с изм. и доп., вступ. в силу с 01.02.2022)
10. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksiga sharhlar. -Toshkent:
TDYuI nashryoti, 2010. – 777-778 bet.
11. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumining “Sudlar tomonidan fuqarolik ishlarini
apellyatsiya, kassatsiya tartibida koʻrishning ayrim masalalari toʻg‘risida” 2024 yil 25
martdagi 9-sonli qarori / https://lex.uz/docs/6881055
12. Fuqarolik ishlari boʻyicha sudga murojaat qilish tartibi [Matn] / X.Yodgorov va boshqalar
– Toshkent: Baktria press, 2016. -163 b.
13. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumining “Sudlar tomonidan fuqarolik ishlarini
apellyatsiya, kassatsiya tartibida koʻrishning ayrim masalalari toʻg‘risida” 2024 yil 25
martdagi 9-sonli qarori / https://lex.uz/docs/6881055
14. Oʻsha manba. 2-bandi.
15. Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 07.01.2020 y., 03/20/600/0023-son,
14.03.2020 y., 03/20/610/0299-son.
16. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “Davlat boji toʻg‘risida”gi Qonuni, 07.01.2020 y. / “Xalq
soʻzi” gazetasi, №4 (7506)
17. Гражданский процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации от 14 ноября 2002 г.
N 138-ФЗ, 323-статья. (ред. от 30.12.2021) (с изм. и доп., вступ. в силу с 01.02.2022)
18. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumining “Sudlar tomonidan fuqarolik ishlarini
apellyatsiya tartibida koʻrish amaliyoti toʻg‘risida” 2021 yil 20 apreldagi 14-sonli qarori /
www.sud.uz
19. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumining “Fuqarolik ishlari boʻyicha birinchi
instansiya sudining ajrimlari toʻg‘risida” 2019 yil 25 oktabrdagi 19-sonli qarori /
www.sud.uz
