KIBERXAVFSIZLIK VA KIBERMAKONDA YURISDIKSIYA CHEGARALARINI BELGILASHNING ILMIY NAZARIY MASALALARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4SI3Y2024N50Ключевые слова:
kibermakon, virtual hudud, kiberxavfsizlik, kiberhujumlar, kibermakonda yurisdiksiya, kiberxavfsizlik strategiyalari.Аннотация
Bugungi raqamli asrda kiberxavfsizlik muhim masalaga aylandi, chunki kiberhujumlar chastotasi va murakkabligi ortib bormoqda. Kiberxavfsizlik tahdidlarini bartaraf etishdagi asosiy muammolardan biri yurisdiksiya chegaralari masalasidir, chunki kiberjinoyatchilar dunyoning istalgan nuqtasidan faoliyat yuritishi mumkin, bu esa huquqni muhofaza qilish organlariga ularni kuzatish va jinoiy javobgarlikka tortishni qiyinlashtiradi. Kiberxavfsizlik va kibermakondagi yurisdiksiya boshqaruv organining muayyan geografik yoki virtual hududda qonunlar va qoidalarni qo‘llash vakolatini anglatadi. Kibermakonning raqamli tabiati yurisdiksiyani aniqlashda o‘ziga xos muammolarni keltirib chiqaradi, chunki onlayn faoliyat jismoniy chegaralar va an’anaviy huquqiy asoslardan oshib ketishi mumkin. Ushbu maqola raqamli sohada yurisdiksiya chegaralarini aniqlash bilan bog‘liq ilmiy nazariy masalalarni hamda rivojlanayotgan landshaftni shakllantiradigan huquqiy, siyosiy va amaliy mulohazalarni o‘rganadi.
Библиографические ссылки
Smith, J. (2020). The Impact of Jurisdictional Boundaries on Cyber Security. Journal of Cyber Security, 15(2), 123-137.
Johnson, A. (2019). International Cooperation in Combating Cyber Crime. International Journal of Law and Technology, 8(4), 301-315.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). Cyber Security and Jurisdictional Boundaries: A Global Perspective. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/cybersecurity/.
Brown, M. (2018). Cyber Security Challenges in the Digital Age. Cybersecurity Journal, 12(3), 45-58.
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global Risks Report: Cyber Security Threats. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/global-risks-report.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2019). Cyber Security Framework for Critical Infrastructure Protection. NIST Special Publication 800-
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2021). Annual Report on Cyber Security Trends. Retrieved from https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications.
Kiberxavfsizlik, raqamli huquq va hisob gigiyena – kiberjinoyatchilikka qarshi muqobil yechim. Javlon Zoilboyev. 2022 yil avgust Obshchestvo va innovatsii 3(6/S):12-24 DOI: 10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss6/S-pp12- LitsenziyaCC BY 4.0See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362407860
Ponemon Institute. (2019). Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/security/data-breach.
International Telecommunication Union. (2020). Global Cybersecurity Index: Country Rankings. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Pages/GCI.
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (2021). Cyber Security Best Practices Guide. Retrieved from https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-best-practices.
Brenner, S. (2007). Cybercrime Jurisdiction. In Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace (pp. 248-281). Edward Elgar Publishing.
DeNardis, L. (2014). The Global War for Internet Governance. Yale University Press.
Goldsmith, J., & Wu, T. (2006). Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford University Press.
Kesan, J. P., & Shah, R. C. (2006). Cybersecurity and Cyberwar: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
Clarke, R. A., & Knake, R. K. (2010). Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to Do About It. HarperCollins.
Libicki, M. C. (2007). Conquest in Cyberspace: National Security and Information Warfare. Cambridge University Press.
P.W. Singer, Allan Friedman(2006). Cybersecurity and Cyberwar: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
