SUN'IY INTELLEKTNING OLIY TA'LIM SIFATI VA SAMARADORLIGIGA TA'SIRI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I9Y2024N52Ключевые слова:
ChatGPT, sun'iy intellekt, chatbot, sun'iy ong, sifat nazorati, oliy ta'lim, raqamli inqilob, umumiy sifat menejmentiАннотация
Ushbu tadqiqot OpenAI'ning ChatGPT kabi sun'iy intellekt chat-botlarining oliy ta'lim muassasalaridagi (HEIs) sifat va samaradorligiga ta'sirini o'rganadi. PubMed, Emerald va Google Scholar kabi manbalardan foydalangan holda keng qamrovli adabiyotlar tahlili orqali ChatGPT'ni ta'limga integratsiya qilishning afzalliklari va xavflari yoritilgan. Tadqiqot natijalari sun'iy intellekt talabalarning o'qish jarayoni va ko'nikmalarini rivojlantirishga ijobiy ta'sir ko'rsatishini, shu orqali o'qituvchilarga sifatli ta'lim berishga ko'proq e'tibor qaratish imkonini berishini ko'rsatadi. Shuningdek, tadqiqotda nazariy yondashuv ham kiritilgan bo'lib, bu yondashuv konstruktivizm, sotsial-madaniy va kognitiv o'rganish nazariyalaridan kelib chiqib, sun'iy intellektning faol o'rganish, shaxsiylashtirilgan muhit va ijtimoiy o'zaro ta'sirdagi rolini tahlil qiladi. Tadqiqotda sun'iy intellektni oliy ta'lim dasturlariga chuqurroq integratsiya qilish zarurati ta'kidlanar ekan, axloqiy masalalarni ham hisobga olish lozimligi ko'rsatib o'tilgan. Tadqiqotda xavfsizlik, plagiat va ish o'rinlarining qisqarishi kabi jamiyatga kengroq ta'sirlar borasida xavotirlar mavjudligiga qaramay, sun'iy intellektning ilmiy tadqiqotlar, baholash samaradorligi va talabalarga xizmat ko'rsatishdagi aniq foydalari ta'kidlangan. Shuning uchun, tadqiqot AI'ni ta'limga mas'uliyat bilan joriy qilish va xavflarni minimallashtirish uchun muvozanatli tartibga solish choralari zarurligini ta'kidlaydi, ta'lim natijalarini yaxshilash uchun sun'iy intellektni ehtiyotkorlik bilan integratsiya qilish lozim.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Abbos Utkirov (2023). Challenges in implementing TQM in higher education institutions. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари / Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук / Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(7), pp.61–67. https://doi.org/10.47390/scp1342v3i7y2023n09.
2. Abbos Utkirov (2024). Total quality management and performance achievement in higher education. Zenodo, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11620030.
3. AIPRM (2024). 100+ ChatGPT statistics 2024 · AIPRM. [online] Available at: https://www.aiprm.com/chatgpt-statistics/ [Accessed 26 Aug. 2024].
4. AI Index Steering Committee (2023). Artificial intelligence index report 2023. Stanford University, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI). Retrieved from https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report_2023.pdf.
5. Agarwal, N., Danielsen, N., Gravdal, P., & Bours, P. (2022). Contract cheat detection using biometric keystroke dynamics. 20th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). IEEE Xplore, 15–21.
6. Agulla, E., Rifón, L., Castro, J., & Mateo, C. (2008). Is my student on the other side? Applying biometric web authentication to E-learning environments. Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, IEEE Xplore, 551–553.
7. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI Ethics, 2, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7.
8. AlDhaen, F. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence in higher education – systematic review. In M. Alaali (Ed.), COVID-19 Challenges to University Information Technology Governance, Springer.
9. Alerskans, E., Nyborg, J., Birk, M., & Kaas, E. (2022). A transformer neural network for predicting near-surface temperature. Meteorol. App., 29, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.2098.
10. Allen Institute for AI. (n.d.). Grover - a state-of-the-art defense against neural fake news. Available at: https://grover.allenai.org/detect [Accessed April 8, 2024].
11. Alrawi, M. (2023). Davos 2023: AI chatbot to ‘change education forever within six months’. The National News, January 17, 2023. Available at: https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/2023/01/17/davos-2023-ai-chatbot-to-change-education-forever-within-six-months/ [Accessed January 22, 2023].
12. Altman, S. (2022). ChatGPT launched on Wednesday. Today it crossed 1 million users! [tweet]. Twitter. Available at: https://twitter.com/sama/status/1599668808285028353 [Accessed January 1, 2024].
13. Aqiilah, N., & Zalfa, K. (2023). Online paraphrasing tools in EFL academic writing: Problems, affordances, and students' feelings [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga.
14. Arun, K., Nagesh, S., & Ganga, P. (2019). A multi-model and AI-based Collegebot management system (AICMS) for professional engineering colleges. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., 8, 2910–2914. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.I8818.078919.
15. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN Preprint, (January 25, 2024). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484.
16. Bang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., & Fung, P. (2023). A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of ChatGPT on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04023.
17. Bastiansen, M., Kroon, A., & Araujo, T. (2022). Female chatbots are helpful, male chatbots are competent? Publizistik, 67, 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-022-00762-8.
18. Bellapu, A. (2021). Why transformer model for natural language processing? Analytics Insight. Available at: https://www.analyticsinsight.net/why-transformer-model-for-natural-language-processing/ [Accessed January 1, 2024].
19. Bendig, E., Erb, B., Schulze-Thuesing, L., & Baumeister, H. (2019). The next generation: Chatbots in clinical psychology and psychotherapy to foster mental health–a scoping review. Verhaltenstherapie, 29, 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499492.
20. Bengio, Y., Russell, S., & Musk, E. (2020). Pause giant AI experiments: AN OPEN LETTER. Available at: https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ [Accessed April 1, 2024].
21. Benotti, L., Martnez, M., & Schapachnik, F. (2018). A tool for introducing computer science with automatic formative assessment. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., 11, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2682084.
22. Bensinger, G. (2023). ChatGPT launches boom in AI-written e-books on Amazon. Reuter. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-launches-boom-ai-written-e-books-amazon-2023-02-21/ [Accessed March 4, 2024].
23. Bhuiyan, J. (2023). ‘We have to move fast’: US looks to establish rules for artificial intelligence. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/apr/11/us-artificial-intelligence-rules-accountability-measures [Accessed April 13, 2024].
24. Biswas, S. S. (2023a). Potential use of ChatGPT in global warming. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 51, 1126–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03171-8.
25. Biswas, S. S. (2023b). Role of ChatGPT in public health. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 51, 868–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03172-7.
26. Brad Rose Consulting (2018). Robots Grade Your Essays and Read Your Resumes. [online] Brad Rose Consulting. Available at: https://bradroseconsulting.com/robots-grade-your-essays-and-read-your-resumes/ [Accessed 5 Sep. 2024].
27. Brito, C., Ciampi, M., Sluss, J., & Santos, H. (2019). Trends in engineering education: A disruptive view for not so far future. 2019 18th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 1–5.
28. Brodkin, J. (2023). GPT-4 poses too many risks, and releases should be halted, AI group tells FTC. Available at: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/ftc-should-investigate-openai-and-halt-gpt-4-releases-ai-research-group-says/ [Accessed April 1, 2024].
29. Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712.
30. Bushwick, S., & Mukerjee, M. (2022). ChatGPT explains why AIs like ChatGPT should be regulated. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chatgpt-explains-why-ais-like-chatgpt-should-be-regulated/ [Accessed January 1, 2024].
31. Cao, Z., Wei, F., Li, W., & Li, S. (2017). Faithful to the original: Fact aware neural abstractive summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04434v1 [cs.IR]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.04434.
32. Cassidy, C. (2023). Australian universities to return to ‘pen and paper’ exams after students caught using AI to write essays. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jan/10/universities-to-return-to-pen-and-paper-exams-after-students-caught-using-ai-to-write-essays [Accessed January 18, 2024].
33. Cassens Weiss, D. (2017). JPMorgan Chase uses tech to save 360,000 hours of annual work by lawyers and loan officers. [online] ABA Journal. Available at: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/jpmorgan_chase_uses_tech_to_save_360000_hours_of_annual_work_by_lawyers_and [Accessed 5 Sep. 2024]
34. Castangia, M., Medina, L., Aliberti, A., Rossi, C., Macii, A., Macii, E., et al. (2023). Transformer neural networks for interpretable flood forecasting. Environ. Model. Softw., 160, 105581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105581.
35. Chance, C. (2022). Has there been a second AI big Bang? Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/calumchace/2022/10/18/has-there-been-a-second-ai-big-bang/?sh=7f7860fb6f74 [Accessed January 1, 2023].
36. Chavez, H., Chavez-Arias, B., Contreras-Rosas, S., Alvarez-Rodríguez, J. M., & Raymundo, C. (2023). Artificial neural network model to predict student performance using non-personal information. Front Educ., 8, 1106679. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1106679.
37. Chen, S. (2023). ChatGPT-5 rumored to launch at the end of 2023, will it achieve AGI? [blog post]. Available at: https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/04/01/chatgpt-5-rumored-to-launch-at-the-end-of-2023-will-it-achieve-agi/ [Accessed April 2, 2023].
38. Clarizia, F., Colace, F., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., & Santaniello, D. (2018). Chatbot: An education support system for students. In A. Castiglione, F. Pop, M. Ficco, & F. Palmieri (Eds), Cyberspace Safety and Security, 11161. Springer: Cham.
39. ColdFusion. (2022). It’s time to pay attention to A.I. (ChatGPT and beyond) [video]. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uQqMxXoNVs [Accessed January 1, 2023].
40. Crossplag (n.d.). AI content detector. Available at: https://crossplag.com/ai-content-detector/ [Accessed April 8, 2023].
41. Cunningham-Nelson, S., Boles, W., Trouton, L., & Margerison, E. (2019). A review of Chatbots in education: Practical steps forward. Proceedings of the AAEE2019 conference Brisbane, Australia. Available at: https://aaee.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AAEE2019_Annual_Conference_paper_184.pdf.
42. Dastin, J., Hu, K., & Dave, P. (2022). Exclusive: ChatGPT owner OpenAI projects $1 billion in revenue by 2024. Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/business/chatgpt-owner-openai-projects-1-billion-revenue-by-2024-sources-2022-12-15/ [Accessed April 1, 2023].
43. Dempere, J.M., Modugu, K.P., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L.K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936.
44. Durall, E., & Kapros, E. (2020). Co-design for a competency self-assessment Chatbot and survey in science education. In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds), Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Human and Technology Ecosystems, Springer: Cham, 12206.
45. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., et al. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.
46. Elecrow. (2023). Introducing ChatGPT4: The next generation of language models. Elecrow. Available at: https://www.elecrow.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt4-the-next-generation%C2%A0of%C2%A0language-models.html [Accessed March 3, 2023].
47. Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023). GPTs are GPTs: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.10130v4 [Accessed April 1, 2023].
48. Essel, H., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E., & Baah, P. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (Chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., 19, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6.
49. Falke, T., Ribeiro, L., Utama, P., Dagan, I., & Gurevych, I. (2019). Ranking generated summaries by correctness: An interesting but challenging application for natural language inference. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2214–2220.
50. Felix, C. (2020). “The role of the teacher and AI in education” in International Perspectives on the Role of Technology in Humanizing Higher Education Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning. Eds. E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger, & M. S. Makhanya, vol. 33 (Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited), 33–48.
51. Felten, E., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2023). How will language modelers like ChatGPT affect occupations and industries? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01157v2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.01157.
52. Fitzpatrick, K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment. Health, 4, e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785.
53. Fryer, L., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and human task partners. Comput. Human Behav., 75, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045.
54. Fulmer, R., Joerin, A., Gentile, B., Lakerink, L., & Rauws, M. (2018). Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment. Health, 5, e64. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9782.
55. Gaceta, La (2023). Prohíben usar la ChatGPT en varias universidades. Available at: https://www.lagaceta.com.ar/nota/978320/sociedad/prohiben-usar-chatgpt-varias-universidades.html [Accessed February 5, 2023].
56. Gao, C., Howard, F., Markov, N., Dyer, E., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., et al. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv preprint, 2022.12.23.521610. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610.
57. Georgescu, A. (2018). Chatbots for education - Trends, benefits, and challenges. Int. Sci. Conf. eLearn. Softw. Educ., 2, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-18-097.
58. GESTION (2023). Los primeros trabajos perdidos en Estados Unidos por la Inteligencia Artificial ChatGPT. Available at: https://gestion.pe/economia/management-empleo/chatgpt-los-primeros-trabajos-perdidos-en-estados-unidos-por-la-implementacion-de-la-inteligencia-artificial-nnda-nnlt-noticia/ [Accessed March 3, 2023].
59. Ghosal, S. (2023). ChatGPT on characteristic mode analysis. TechRxiv Preprint, 70, 1008–1019. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21900342.v1.
60. Goldman, S. (2022). OpenAI CEO admits ChatGPT risks. What now? | The AI beat. VentureBeat. Available at: https://venturebeat.com/ai/openai-ceo-admits-chatgpt-risks-what-now-the-ai-beat/ [Accessed January 1, 2023].
61. GPT, Chat (2022). In Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT [Accessed January 1, 2023].
62. GPT-2 Output Detector Demo (2022). Hugging Face, Inc. Available at: https://huggingface.co/openai-detector/ [Accessed January 3, 2023].
63. Hakimova Muhabbat, Kalonov Mukhiddin, Jalil, H., Khimmataliev Dustnazar, Turabekov Farxod, Mamarajabov Shavkat, Khakimova Khulkar, & Shaturaev Jakhongir (2024). The digital frontier: AI-enabled transformations in higher education management. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(1), pp.71–88. Available at: https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJERT/article/view/60367/23424 [Accessed 30 Aug. 2024].
64. Han, S.J., Ransom, K.J., Perfors, A., & Kemp, C. (2024). Inductive reasoning in humans and large language models. Cognitive Systems Research, 83, p.101155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101155.
65. Han, B., Buchanan, G. and McKay, D. (2022). Learning in the Panopticon. ACMDL. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3572921.3572937.
66. Hatzius, J., Briggs, J., Kodnani, D., & Pierdomenico, G. (2023). The potentially large effects of artificial intelligence on economic growth. Available at: https://www.key4biz.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Global-Economics-Analyst_-The-Potentially-Large-Effects-of-Artificial-Intelligence-on-Economic-Growth-Briggs_Kodnani.pdf [Accessed April 1, 2023].
67. Hien, H., Cuong, P.-N., Nam, L., Nhung, H., & Thang, L. (2018). Intelligent assistants in higher-education environments: The fit-ebot, a Chatbot for administrative and learning support. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Info and Communication Technology, 69–76.
68. Hu, J. (2020). Online test proctoring claims to prevent cheating. But at what cost? SLATE. Available at: https://slate.com/technology/2020/10/online-proctoring-proctoru-proctorio-cheating-research.html [Accessed January 3, 2023].
69. Hu, K. (2023). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base - analyst note. Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/ [Accessed February 5, 2023].
70. Huang, T.-L., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: The moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2.
71. Insights, Oxford. (2022). Government AI readiness index 2022. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58b2e92c1e5b6c828058484e/t/639b495cc6b59c620c3ecde5/1671121299433/Government_AI_Readiness_2022_FV.pdf.
72. Islam, A., Kader, F., & Shin, S. (2018). BSSSQS: A Blockchain-based smart and secured scheme for question sharing in the Smart education system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.03917v1 [cs.CR]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.03917.
73. Ismail, M., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2019). Lecturer’s apprentice: A Chatbot for assisting novice programmers. IEEE Xplore. 2019 International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC), 1–8.
74. Jackson, E. and Abraham (2024). The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence: A Theoretical Review of its Impact on Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence: A Theoretical Review of its Impact on Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age. [online] Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/280893/1/Evolution%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf [Accessed 5 Sep. 2024].
75. Jakob Steinschaden (2023). The ChatGPT attack on Google and the effects so far. [online] Trending Topics. Available at: https://www.trendingtopics.eu/the-chatgpt-attack-on-google-and-the-effects-so-far/ [Accessed 26 Aug. 2024].
76. Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A., Topalis, J., et al. (2022). ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: An exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14882v1 [cs.CL]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.14882.
77. Kamalov, F., Sulieman, H., & Calonge, D. (2021). Machine learning-based approach to exam cheating detection. PLoS One, 16, e0254340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254340.
78. Kasepalu, R., Prieto, L. P., Ley, T., & Chejara, P. (2022). Teacher artificial intelligence-supported pedagogical actions in collaborative learning coregulation: A wizard-of-Oz study. Front Educ., 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.736194.
79. Kerly, A., & Bull, S. (2006). The potential for Chatbots in negotiated learner modeling: A wizard-of-Oz study. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 4053, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_44.
80. Kim, S., Lee, J., & Gweon, G. (2019). “Comparing data from Chatbot and web surveys” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI, vol. 19, 1–12.
81. King, M. R. (2023). ChatGPT: A conversation on artificial intelligence, Chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cell. Mol. Bioeng., 16, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8.
82. Klos, M., Escoredo, M., Joerin, A., Lemos, V., Rauws, M., & Bunge, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence–based Chatbot for anxiety and depression in university students: Pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Formative Res., 5, e20678. https://doi.org/10.2196/20678.
83. Kono, Y. (2022). Student Learning in the Age of AI. Digital Designs for Money, Markets, and Social Dilemmas, [online] pp.427–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0937-5_19.
84. L’Heureux, A., Grolinger, K., & Capretz, M. A. M. (2022). Transformer-based model for electrical load forecasting. Eng., 15, 4993. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15144993.
85. Leavy, S. (2018). Gender bias in artificial intelligence: The need for diversity and gender theory in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering (GE ‘18). New York, NY, USA, 14–16.
86. Lee, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, P. Y. (2022). Impacts of an AI Chatbot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 70, 1843–1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8.
87. Libert, K. (2023). Only 34% of educators support the decision to ban ChatGPT. EINPRESSWIRE, January 16, 2023. Available at: https://www.einpresswire.com/article/611597643/only-34-of-educators-support-the-decision-to-ban-chatgpt [Accessed January 22, 2023].
88. Lopez-Lira, A., & Tang, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT forecast stock price movements? Return predictability and large language models. SSRN Preprint. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412788.
89. Lukpat, A. (2023). ChatGPT banned in New York City public schools over concerns about cheating, learning development. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/chatgpt-banned-in-new-york-city-public-schools-over-concerns-about-cheating-learning-development-11673024059 [Accessed January 8, 2023].
90. Lund, B., & Agbaji, D. (2023). Information literacy, data literacy, privacy literacy, and ChatGPT: Technology literacies align with perspectives on emerging technology adoption within communities (January 14, 2023). SSRN Preprint. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4324580.
91. Mabunda, K., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2019). Pathbot: An intelligent Chatbot for guiding visitors and locating venues. IEEE Xplore. 2019 6th International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI), 160–168.
92. Ma, Y. and Siau, K. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Impacts on Higher Education. MWAIS 2018 Proceedings. [online] Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/mwais2018/42/ [Accessed 5 Sep. 2024].
93. Mao, H., Fang, Z., & Xia, Z. (2023). Model of the Influence of Students’ Participation on Learning Effects Using Educational Artificial Intelligence. 2023 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA), 512-515.
94. Maynez, J., Narayan, S., Bohnet, B., & McDonald, R. (2020). On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1906–1919.
95. McArdle, M. (2024). Opinion | AI is coming for the professional class. Expect outrage — and fear. Washington Post. [online] 1 May. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/04/29/ai-professional-class-low-skill-jobs/ [Accessed 26 Aug. 2024].
96. McCallum, S. (2023). ChatGPT banned in Italy over privacy concerns. BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60929651 [Accessed April 13, 2023].
97. Meckler, L., & Verma, P. (2022). Teachers are on alert for inevitable cheating after the release of ChatGPT. The Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/12/28/chatbot-cheating-ai-chatbotgpt-teachers/ [Accessed January 2, 2023].
98. Miller, F., Katz, J., & Gans, R. (2018). AI x I = AI²: The OD imperative to add inclusion to the algorithms of artificial intelligence. OD Practitioner, 5, 6–12.
99. Mohammad, T., Abbas, A., Nazim, M., & Idris, S. (2023). EFL paraphrasing skills with QuillBot: Unveiling students' enthusiasm and insights. Journal of Pedagogical Research. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202324645.
100. Murtarellia, G., Gregory, A., & Romentia, S. (2021). A conversation-based perspective for shaping ethical human–machine interactions: The particular challenge of Chatbots. J. Bus. Res., 129, 927–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.018.
101. Norris, M. (2019). University online cheating -- how to mitigate the damage. Res. High. Educ. J., 37, 1–20.
102. Nunamaker, J., Derrick, D., Elkins, A., Burgoon, J., & Patton, M. (2011). Embodied conversational agent-based kiosk for automated interviewing. J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 28, 17–48. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280102.
103. O’Donovan, M. A., McCallion, P., McCarron, M., Lynch, L., Mannan, H., & Byrne, E. (2019). A narrative synthesis scoping review of life course domains within health service utilization frameworks [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. HRB Open Res., 2, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12900.1.
104. Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Comput. Educ., 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033.
105. OpenAI (2022). Playground. Available at: www.OpenAI.com and https://beta.openai.com/playground.
106. OpenAI (2023). AI text classifier [website]. Available at: https://beta.openai.com/ai-text-classifier [Accessed April 8, 2023].
107. OpenAI (2024a). GPT-4o system card. [online] Available at: https://cdn.openai.com/gpt-4o-system-card.pdf [Accessed 30 Aug. 2024].
108. OpenAI (2024b). Introducing ChatGPT Edu: An affordable offering for universities to responsibly bring AI to campus. Open.AI. [online] Available at: https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-edu/ [Accessed 30 Aug. 2024].
109. OpenAI (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774.
110. Ordonez, V., Dunn, T., & Noll, E. (2023). OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says AI will reshape society, acknowledges risks: ‘a little bit scared of this’. Available at: https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/openai-ceo-sam-altman-ai-reshape-society-acknowledges/story?id=76971838 [Accessed April 1, 2023].
111. Originality.AI – plagiarism checker and AI detector (2023). Available at: https://originality.ai/#about [Accessed January 3, 2023].
112. Ortiz, S. (2022). What is ChatGPT, and why does it matter? Here’s what you need to know. ZDNET. Available at: https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-chatgpt-and-why-does-it-matter-heres-what-you-need-to-know/ [Accessed January 1, 2023].
113. Page, L., & Gehlbach, H. (2017). How an artificially intelligent virtual assistant helps students navigate the road to college. AERA Open, 3, 233285841774922. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417749220.
114. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
115. Patel, S. B., & Lam, K. (2023). ChatGPT: The future of discharge summaries? Lancet Digit. Health, 5, e107–e108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3.
116. Pavlik, J. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. J. Mass Commun. Educ., 78, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577.
117. Perry, N., Srivastava, M., Kumar, D., & Boneh, D. (2022). Do users write more insecure code with AI assistants? arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.03622v2 [cs.CR]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.03622.
118. Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc., 13, 141–1461. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
119. Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., et al. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synthesis, 18, 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
120. Pham, X., Pham, T., Nguyen, Q., Nguyen, T., & Cao, T. (2018). Chatbot as an intelligent personal assistant for mobile language learning. ICEEL 2018: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education and E-Learning, 16–21.
121. Pickard, M., Schuetzler, R., Valacich, J., & Wood, D. (2017). Next-generation accounting interviewing: A comparison of human and embodied conversational agents (ECAs) as interviewers. SSRN Electron. J., April, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2959693.
122. Point, Check (2023). OPWNAI: Cybercriminals starting to use CHATGPT. Available at: https://research.checkpoint.com/2023/opwnai-cybercriminals-starting-to-use-chatgpt/ [Accessed January 18, 2023].
123. Qin, C., Zhang, A., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Yasunaga, M., & Yang, D. (2023). Is ChatGPT a general-purpose natural language processing task solver? arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06476. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06476.
124. Rahim, N. I. M., Iahad, N. A., Yusof, A. F., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2022). AI Chatbots adoption model for higher-education institutions: A hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Sustainability, 14, 12726. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912726.
125. Rakha, N.A. (2023). Artificial intelligence strategy of Uzbekistan: Policy framework, preferences, and challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.27.
126. Ramos-Pérez, E., Alonso-González, P., & Núñez-Velázquez, J. (2021). Multi-transformer: A new neural network-based architecture for forecasting S&P Volatility. Math, 9, 1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151794.
127. Ranoliya, B., Raghuwanshi, N., & Singh, S. (2017). Chatbot for university-related FAQs. IEEE Xplore. 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications, and Informatics (ICACCI), 1525–1530.
128. Reis-Marques, C., Figueiredo, R., & Neto, M. (2021). Applications of Blockchain technology to higher education arena: A bibliometric analysis. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ., 11, 1406–1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11040101.
129. Reza, S., Campos, M., Machado, J., & Tavares, J. (2022). A multi-head attention-based transformer model for traffic flow forecasting with a comparative analysis of recurrent neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl., 202, 117275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117275.
130. Rodchua, S., Yaiadom-boakye, G., & Woolsey, R. (2011). Student verification system for online assessments: Bolstering quality and integrity of distance learning. J. Technol. Manag. Appl. Eng., 27, 1–8.
131. Roose, K. (2022). The brilliance and weirdness of ChatGPT. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html [Accessed January 1, 2023].
132. Ruby, D. (2023). ChatGPT statistics for 2023: Comprehensive facts and data. [online] Demandsage. Available at: https://www.demandsage.com/chatgpt-statistics/ [Accessed 28 Aug. 2024].
133. Ruipérez-Valiente, J., Muñoz-Merino, P., Alexandron, G., & Pritchard, D. (2017). Using machine learning to detect ‘multiple-account’ cheating and analyze the influence of student and problem features. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., 12, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2784420.
134. Ryan-Mosley, T. (2023). Five big takeaways from Europe’s AI act. MIT Technology Review. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/06/19/1075063/five-big-takeaways-from-europes-ai-act/ [Accessed June 25, 2023].
135. Sandu, N., & Gide, E. (2022). Adoption of AI-Chatbots to enhance student learning experience in higher education in India. IEEE Xplore. 2019 18th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).
136. Sangalli, V., Martinez-Muñoz, G., & Cañabate, E. (2020). Identifying cheating users in online courses in IEEE Xplore. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1168–1175.
137. Shankland, S. (2022). Why Everyone’s obsessed with ChatGPT, a mind-blowing AI Chatbot. CNET. Available at: https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/why-everyones-obsessed-with-chatgpt-a-mind-blowing-ai-chatbot/ [Accessed January 1, 2023].
138. Shorey, S., Ang, E., Yap, J., Ng, E., Lau, S., & Chui, C. (2019). A virtual counseling application using artificial intelligence for communication skills training in nursing education: Development study. J. Med. Internet Res., 21, e14658. https://doi.org/10.2196/14658.
139. Shrivastava, R. (2022). Teachers fear ChatGPT will make cheating easier than ever. Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rashishrivastava/2022/12/12/teachers-fear-chatgpt-will-make-cheating-easier-than-ever/?sh=5b0ab2ac1eef [Accessed on January 2, 2023].
140. Shuster, K., Poff, S., Chen, M., Kiela, D., & Weston, J. (2021). Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07567v1 [cs.CL]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.07567.
141. Sinha, S., Basak, S., Dey, Y., & Mondal, A. (2020). An educational Chatbot for answering queries. In J. Mandal & D. Bhattacharya (Eds), Emerging Technology in Modelling and Graphics, 937. Springer: Singapore.
142. Slepankova, M. (2021). Possibilities of artificial intelligence in education: An assessment of the role of AI Chatbots as a communication medium in higher education (dissertation). Available at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-108427 [Accessed January 1, 2023].
143. Slimi, Z. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education: An Empirical Study. European Journal of Educational Sciences, [online] 10(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no1a17.
144. Smith, C. (2023). GPT-5 might make ChatGPT indistinguishable from a human. BGR. Available at: https://bgr.com/tech/gpt-5-might-make-chatgpt-indistinguishable-from-a-human/ [Accessed April 1, 2023].
145. Sobania, D., Briesch, M., Hanna, C., & Petke, J. (2023). An analysis of the automatic bug fixing performance of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.08653. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.08653.
146. Soper, T. (2023). Seattle public schools bans ChatGPT; district ‘requires original thought and work from students’. GeekWire. Available at: https://www.geekwire.com/2023/seattle-public-schools-bans-chatgpt-district-requires-original-thought-and-work-from-students/ [Accessed January 1, 2023].
147. Stanley, J., Brink, R., Valiton, A., Bostic, T., & Scollan, R. (2022). Chatbot accessibility guidance: A review and way forward. In X. S. Yang, S. Sherratt, N. Dey, & A. Joshi (Eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, vol. 216 (Singapore: Springer).
148. Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09292v1 [cs.AI]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292.
149. Tallyn, E., Fried, H., Gianni, R., Isard, A., & Speed, C. (2018). The Ethnobot: Gathering ethnographies in the age of IoT. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings.
150. Tate, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence will destroy ‘laptop class’ workers. The Hill. Available at: https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/541331-artificial-intelligence-will-destroy-laptop-class-workers [Accessed April 2, 2023].
151. Taulli, T. (2019). Artificial intelligence basics: A non-technical introduction. 1st Edn. CA: Apress Berkeley.
152. Tegos, S., Demetriadis, S., & Karakostas, A. (2015). Promoting academically productive talk with conversational agent interventions in collaborative learning settings. Comput. Educ., 87, 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.014.
153. The Washington Post - Editorial Board (2022). Opinion. We asked an AI bot hundreds of questions. Here’s what we learned. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/interactive/2022/chatgpt-questions-predictions-ethics/ [Accessed January 2, 2023].
154. Thorp, H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379, 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879.
155. Trezise, K., Ryan, T., Barba, P., & Kennedy, G. (2019). Detecting contract cheating using learning analytics. J. Learn. Anal., 6, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.11.
156. Tsai, C., & Wu, J. (2022). A Blockchain-based fair and transparent homework grading system for online education. In K. Daimi, I. Dionysiou, & N. El Madhoun (Eds), Principles and Practice of Blockchains. Cham: Springer.
157. Turnitin (2024). AI writing detection | AI tools | Turnitin. [online] Available at: https://www.turnitin.com/solutions/topics/ai-writing/ [Accessed 30 Aug. 2024].
158. Utkirov, A., & Salahodjayev, R. (2021). Impact of WIUT library activities on labour market outcome. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v2i2.26.
159. Vallés-Pérez, I., Soria-Olivas, E., Martínez-Sober, M., Serrano-López, A., Gómez-Sanchís, J., & Mateo, F. (2022). Approaching sales forecasting using recurrent neural networks and transformers. Expert Syst. Appl., 201, 116993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116993.
160. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762 [cs.CL]. 31st Conf. on Neural Inf. Process. Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
161. Vinichenko, M.V., Rybakova, M.V., Vinogradova, M.V., Malyshev, M.A. and Maksimov, A.A. (2020). The Effect of Digital Economy and Artificial Intelligence on The Participants of The School Educational Process. Propósitos y Representaciones, [online] 8(SPE2). doi:https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8nspe2.694.
162. Walters, L. (2021). Universities expand controversial AI monitoring of students taking online exams. Stuff. Available at: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/126908715/universities-expand-controversial-ai-monitoring-of-students-taking-online-exams [Accessed January 4, 2023].
163. Wang, Y., Petrina, S., & Feng, F. (2017). VILLAGE—virtual immersive language learning and gaming environment: Immersion and presence. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 48, 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12388.
164. WIUT (2024). Uzbekistan-UK education forum 2024. [online] Available at: https://conference.wiut.uz/images/documents/Uzb_UK_EduForum_Summaries_of_Sessions_and_Presentations_05_03_2024_2.pdf [Accessed 30 Aug. 2024].
165. Writer. (n.d.). AI content detector | GPT-3 | GPT-4 | ChatGPT. Available at: https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/ [Accessed April 8, 2023].
166. Wu, N., Green, B., Ben, X., & O’Banion, S. (2020). Deep transformer models for time series forecasting: The influenza prevalence case. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08317v1 [cs.LG]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.08317.
167. Xiao, Z., Zhou, M. X., Chen, W., Yang, H., & Chi, C. (2020). If I hear you correctly: Building and evaluating interview Chatbots with active listening skills. In CHI ‘20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14.
168. Xiao, Z., Zhou, M., Liao, Q., Mark, G., Chi, C., Chen, W., et al. (2020). Tell me about yourself: Using an AI-powered Chatbot to conduct conversational surveys. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 27, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381804.
169. Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for next generation science learning. SSRN Preprint, (January 20, 2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4331313.
170. Zhao, J., Song, T., & Sun, Y. (2020). APIhelper: Helping junior android programmers learn API usage. IAENG Int. J. Comput. Sci., 47, 1–16.
