PARTY AUTONOMY VS CONSUMER PROTECTION IN INTERNATIONAL E-COMMERCE:THE CASE OF UZBEKISTAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6SI1Y2026N45Ключевые слова:
party autonomy; consumer protection; private international law; e-commerce; Uzbekistan; Rome I Regulation; digital platforms; cross-border contracts.Аннотация
The growth of cross-border e-commerce has weakened consumer protection by allowing foreign platforms to impose choice-of-law and jurisdiction clauses. Through a comparative analysis of EU and Uzbek law, this article shows that Uzbekistan lacks effective safeguards and proposes mandatory rules to restore consumer sovereignty and access to justice.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Basedow, J. The Law of Open Societies. Brill, 2015.
2. Dicey, Morris & Collins. The Conflict of Laws. Sweet & Maxwell, 2019.
3. Kramer, X. Private International Law and Consumer Protection. Oxford, 2018.
4. Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F. “Does Anyone Read the Fine Print?” Journal of Legal Studies, 2014.
5. Micklitz, H.-W. The Consumer in the Digital Economy. Cambridge, 2020.
6. Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I).
7. Symeonides, S. Codifying Choice of Law Around the World. Oxford, 2014.
8. Busch, C. Platform Economy and Consumer Law. Springer, 2021.
9. European Commission. Consumer Scoreboard 2022.
10. Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (Brussels I Recast).
11. CJEU, Pammer v Schlüter (C-585/08).
12. CJEU, Amazon EU Sàrl (C-191/15).
13. EU Digital Services Act & Digital Markets Act.
