INNOVATSIYALAR MANBALARI: AKTYOR-TARMOQ NAZARIYASI
Kalit so'zlar
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I10Y2024N38Kalit so'zlar
aktyor, tarmoq, harakatlar dasturi, aktant, o‘zgarish, gibridlik, kvazisubyektAnnotasiya
Maqolada ijtimoiy fanlardagi muhim nazariyalardan biri aktyor-tarmoq nazariyasi mazmuni, asosiy postulatlari bayon qilingan. Nazariyaning o‘zgarishlar, ijod sabablari, omillari borasidagi tushuntirishlari tahlil qilingan. XX-asr oxirida yuzaga kelib, fanlararo metodologik nazariyalardan biriga aylangan aktyor-tarmoq nazariyasining kreativlik va innovatsion jarayonga tatbiqi tavsiflangan.
Manbalar
1. Akirch M, Latour B. A summary of a convenient vocabulary or the semiotics of human and non-human assemblies. In: Bijker WE, Law J, editors. Shaping technology – building society. Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.
2. Alvesson M. De-essentializing the knowledge intensive firm: reflections on sceptical research going against the mainstream. J Manag Stud. 2011;48(7):1640–61.
3. Bijker WE. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs : toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
4. Callon M. The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A, editors. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: sociology of science in the real world. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1986a. p. 19–34.
5. Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J, editor. Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? London: Routledge; 1986b. p. 196–223.
6. Cooren F, Fairhurst GT. Local? Global? No, dislocal: how to scale up from interactions to organization. Paper presented at the the 54th conference of the International Communication Association; 2004.
7. Норбоев Ф. Kreativlik va innovatsiya borasida zamonaviy nazariyalar //Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари/Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук/Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences. – 2023. – Т. 3. – №. 8.
8. Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ Sci. 2011;22(5):1224–39. Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1967.
9. Greimas AJ. On meaning: selected writings in semiotic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1987.
10. Hennion A, Gomart É. A sociology of attachment: music amateurs, drug users. In: Law J, Hassard J, editors. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.
11. Latour B. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993.
12. Latour B. On interobjectivity. Mind Cult Act. 1996;3:228–45.
13. Latour B. Pandora’s hope : essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999b.
14. Latour B. La fabrique du droit : une ethnographie du Conseil d’État. Paris: La Découverte; 2002.
15. Latour B. Reassembling the social : an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
16. Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory life : the social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1979.
17. MacKenzie D. Material markets: how economic agents are constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
