OʻZBEKISTON QONUNCHILIGI ASOSIDA ARBITRAJ KELISHUVINI IJRO ETISH

Mualliflar

  • Sherzodbek Masadikov

Kalit so'zlar

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5SI1Y2025N55

Kalit so'zlar

arbitraj kelishuvi; haqiqiylik; vakolat; arbitrajga taalluqlilik; ijro etish.

Annotasiya

Ushbu maqolada Oʻzbekiston qonunchiligida arbitraj kelishuvining ijrosini taʼminlash masalalari koʻrib chiqilgan. Milliy va xalqaro hujjatlar va yoʻriqnomalarga, jumladan UNCITRALning Xalqaro tijorat arbitraji toʻgʻrisidagi Namunaviy qonuni, Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “Xalqaro tijorat arbitraji toʻgʻrisida”gi qonuni va Nyu-York Konvensiyasiga (1958-yil) havola qilinadi. Arbitraj kelishuvining haqiqiyligi va uning ijrosi, nizolarning arbitrajga taalluqliligi masalalari Oʻzbekistonda arbitraj kelishuvini ijro etish nuqtai nazaridan tahlil qilinadi.

Manbalar

1. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On International Commercial Arbitration”. https://lex.uz/docs/5698676

2. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-09955_e_ebook.pdf

3. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf

4. ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook for Judges. 2011. https://icac.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/ICCAs-Guide-to-the-Interpretation-of-the-1958-New-York-Convention-A-Handbook-for-Judges-2.pdf

5. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-09955_e_ebook.pdf

6. Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz/docs/180550

7. The Republic of Uzbekistan joined the CISG on 30 August 1996 without any reservations, entering into force on 1 December 1997. https://lex.uz/docs/2630897

8. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna, 1980) (CISG). https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-09951_e_ebook.pdf

9. ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook for Judges. 2011. p. 42. https://icac.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/ICCAs-Guide-to-the-Interpretation-of-the-1958-New-York-Convention-A-Handbook-for-Judges-2.pdf

10. Economic Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz/docs/3523895

11. Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz/docs/180550

12. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Limited and Additional Liability Companies”. https://lex.uz/docs/18793

13. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Joint-stock Companies and Protection of Shareholders' Rights”. https://lex.uz/acts/14667

14. Ferrario P. The Group of Companies Doctrine in International Commercial Arbitration: Is There any Reason for this Doctrine to Exist? Journal of International Arbitration. Vol. 26, Issue 5 (2009).

15. Blackaby N. et al. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 6th ed. 2015.

16. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Arbitration Courts”. https://lex.uz/docs/1072094

17. Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz/docs/180550

18. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On International Commercial Arbitration”. https://lex.uz/docs/5698676

19. UNCITRAL 2012 Digest of Case Law on the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/ mal-digest-2012-e.pdf

20. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Insolvency”. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/5957616

21. Hertel T. and Covi A. Arbitrability of Shareholder Disputes in Germany. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. February 7, 2018. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/02/07/arbitrability-shareholder-disputes-germany/

22. Koh M. Singapore Court of Appeal: Prima Facie Standard for Stay in Favour of Arbitration and Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. March 25, 2016. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/03/25/singapore-court-of-appeal-affirms-prima-facie-standard-for-stay-in-favour-of-arbitration/

23. Allemann R. Setting the Ground for Corporate Arbitration in Switzerland: Swiss Parliament Approves New Rules for Arbitration of Corporate Law Disputes. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. August 17, 2020. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/08/17/setting-the-ground-for-corporate-arbitration-in-switzerland-swiss-parliament-approves-new-rules-for-arbitration-of-corporate-law-disputes/

24. The Law applies to national and foreign investments, with the exclusion of centralized investments, concession, product sharing agreements, mutual and venture funds, regulation of the capital market, transactions with securities, public-private partnerships, special economic zones (Article 1). https://lex.uz/ru/docs/4664144#4666314

25. Para. 1(a). https://lex.uz/docs/4039518

26. Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v Soler Chrysler Plymouth Inc. 473 US 614, 105 S. Ct 3346 (1985).

27. Fiona Trust & Holding Corp v. Privalov, [2007] UKHL 40.

##submission.downloads##

Topilgan

2025-02-27

Nashr qilingan

2025-02-27

Qanday ko'rsatish

Masadikov, S. (2025). OʻZBEKISTON QONUNCHILIGI ASOSIDA ARBITRAJ KELISHUVINI IJRO ETISH. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 5(S/1), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5SI1Y2025N55