INGLIZ TILI YOZUVIDA GRAMMATIK XATOLARNI AVTOMATIK ANIQLASH VA TUZATISH DASTURLARINI JORIY QILISH

Mualliflar

  • Madina Rakhmatova

Kalit so'zlar

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I3Y2026N55

Kalit so'zlar

ingliz tili yozuvi, grammatik xatolar, avtomatik aniqlash, sunʼiy intellekt, GEC, raqamli taʼlim, yozuv koʻnikmasi, pedagogik eksperiment.

Annotasiya

Mazkur maqolada ingliz tili yozuvida grammatik xatolarni avtomatik aniqlash va tuzatish dasturlarini oliy taʼlim jarayoniga joriy etishning metodik asoslari va samaradorligi tadqiq etiladi. Tadqiqot aralash metod (miqdoriy va sifat tahlili) asosida tashkil etilib, pedagogik eksperiment orqali tajriba va nazorat guruhlari natijalari taqqoslandi. Eksperimental jarayonda sunʼiy intellektga asoslangan platformalar, Grammarly, ProWritingAid va ChatGPT, yordamida yozma ishlar tahlil qilindi. Natijalar grammatik xatolar sonining sezilarli kamayganini, talabalar mustaqil tahrirlash koʻnikmasi rivojlanganini hamda yozuv aniqligi oshganini koʻrsatdi. Tadqiqotda avtomatik sharh tizimlarining pedagogik samaradorligi statistik jihatdan asoslab berildi hamda ularni taʼlim jarayoniga integratsiya qilish boʻyicha metodik tavsiyalar ishlab chiqildi.

Manbalar

1. Bryant, C., Yuan, Z., Qorib, M. R., Cao, H., Ng, H. T., & Briscoe, T. (2023). Grammatical error correction: A survey of the state of the art. Computational Linguistics, 643-701.

2. Damerau, F. J. (1964). A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM, 7(3), 171-176.

3. Elov, B., & Ahmedova, M. (2025). Til korpusi matnlarida imlo tuzatish. Computer linguistics: problems, solutions, prospects, 1(1).

4. Ilfiah, I., Hudzaifah, I., Syarifah, S., & Islam, S. (2024). Ability to Evaluate Students' Written Essay Errors Using Quillbot Grammar Checker. Teaching English to Young Learners in Indonesia (TEYLIN), 5(1), 31-39.

5. Khabutdinov, I. A., Chashchin, A. V., Grabovoy, A. V., Kildyakov, A. S., & Chekhovich, U. V. (2024). RuGECToR: Rule-based neural network model for Russian language grammatical error correction. Programming and Computer Software, 50(4), 315-321.

6. Omelianchuk, K., Liubonko, A., Skurzhanskyi, O., Chernodub, A., Korniienko, O., & Samokhin, I. (2024, June). Pillars of grammatical error correction: Comprehensive inspection of contemporary approaches in the era of large language models. In Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2024) (pp. 17-33).

7. Raheem, B. R., Anjum, F., & Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). Exploring the profound impact of artificial intelligence applications (Quillbot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English academic writing: A systematic review. International Journal of Integrative Research (IJIR), 1(10), 599-622.

8. Track, L. L. M., & Track, U. CRAC 2025 Shared Task on Multilingual Coreference Resolution.

9. Wang, D., Su, J., & Yu, H. (2020). Feature extraction and analysis of natural language processing for deep learning English language. IEEE Access, 8, 46335-46345.

10. Zhu, J., Shi, X., & Zhang, S. (2021). Machine learning‐based grammar error detection method in English composition. Scientific programming, 2021(1), 4213791.

##submission.downloads##

Yuborilgan

2026-03-15

Nashr qilingan

2026-03-15

Qanday ko'rsatish

Rakhmatova, M. (2026). INGLIZ TILI YOZUVIDA GRAMMATIK XATOLARNI AVTOMATIK ANIQLASH VA TUZATISH DASTURLARINI JORIY QILISH. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 6(3), 379–384. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I3Y2026N55