EXECUTION OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRAL AWARDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I2Y2025N74Keywords:
arbitration, arbitral awards, enforcement.Abstract
In the ICA, a party, for whose interest an award is rendered, wants to enforce the award as soon as possible. If the losing party do not enforce the award voluntary then succeeded party have to address to state court to get enforcing order. In the following section types of available execution mechanism are discussed.
References
1. SOUSA UVA P. A comparative reflection on challenge of arbitral awards through the lens of the arbitrator’s duty on impartiality and independence[J/OL]. The American review of international arbitration, 20(4)[2021–01–30]. https://a.storyblok.com/f/46533/x/ed79ac2aab/comparative-reflection-on-challenge-of-arbitral-awards-thru-lens-of-arbitrators-duty-of-impartiality-pedro-sousa-uva-2010.pdf.
2. BADMUS-BUSARI F. Sovereign Immunity and Enforcement of Awards in International Commercial Arbitration[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2336664; OTAKHONOV F, UMIRDINOV A. Chapter 11 : Uzbekistan Arbitration Court of. Law and Practice of International Arbitration in the CIS Region Jurisdiction. Kluwer Law International[J]. 2017: 1–30.
3. CAPALDO G Z. The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2015[M]//The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2015. Oxford University Press, 2016. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190647759.001.0001; KARAKETOV M. Creating an appropriate model of Court-connected mediation for Uzbekistan[J]. Nagoya Journal of Law and Politics 207, 208 (2014), 2014: 207–214.
4. MARTINEZ R. Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards Under the United Nations Convention of 1958: The 《Refusal》 Provisions[R].
5. MUSTILL M. Arbitration in International Trade. By Rene David[J/OL]. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35(4): 1005–1007[2021–01–30]. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/Art./abs/arbitration-in-international-trade-by-rene-david-deventer-kluwer-law-taxation-1985-xii-482-pp-dfl-1806248-commercial-arbitration-in-the-federal-republic-of-germany-by-ottoarndt-glossner-deventer-kluwer-law-taxation-1984-xiv-137-pp-dfl903375/25DBDD6DF2C0BB0ECB99D931EE44E11E. DOI:10.1093/iclqaj/35.4.1005.
6. MULCAHY C, CAVE LEIGHTON B. A Right of Appeal in International Arbitration: Second Bite of the Cherry: Sweet or Sour? BCLP international arbitration survey 2020 - Kluwer Arbitration Blog[J/OL]. 2020. [2021–01–30]. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/05/19/a-right-of-appeal-in-international-arbitration-second-bite-of-the-cherry-sweet-or-sour-bclp-international-arbitration-survey-2020/.
7. DELAUME G R. State Contracts and Transnational Arbitration[J]. American Journal of International Law, 75(4): 784–819. DOI:10.2307/2201354; Arab African Energy Corpn. Ltd. v. Olieprodukten Nederland B.V. - Q.B.D. (Com.Ct.) (Leggatt J.) - 12 May 1983[EB/OL] [2021–01–30]. https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=12745; Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd (The Nema) [1982] AC 724 | Practical Law[EB/OL] [2021–01–30]. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/D-016-0967?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true; Marine Contractors Inc. v. Shell Petroleum Development Co. of Nigeria Ltd. - Q.B.D. (Com.Ct.) (Staughton J.) - 10 June 1983[EB/OL][2021–01–30]. https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=12752.
8. UK Arbitration Act 1996[Z/OL] [2021–01–30]. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/23/contents.
9. Art. 26(9) LCIA Arbitration Rules[S/OL]. [2021–01–30]. https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2020.aspx.
10. Federal Statute on Private International Law[S].
11. Belgium - Code Judiciaire 19 May 1998[S/OL]. [2020–11–11]. https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/belgium.code.judicature.1998/portrait.pdf.
12. Art. 34 同【37】段; 同【52】p.; Moran v Lloyd’s, [1983] 2 All ER 200[S/OL]. [2021–01–30]. http://www.uniset.ca/lloydata/19832AllER200.htm; Waters & Ors v Welsh Development Agency | [2004] UKHL 19 | United Kingdom House of Lords | Judgment | Law | CaseMine[Z/OL] [2021–01–30]. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff70260d03e7f57ea5930.
13. King v Thomas McKenna Ltd [Z/OL] [2021–01–30]. https://www.keatingchambers.com/case-report/king-v-thomas-mckenna-ltd/ In the Court of Appeal on the existence of a sealed offer in an arbitration and its effect on an order for costs.
14. SAMUEL A. Arbitration in Western Europe - A Generation of Reform[J/OL]. Arbitration International, 2014, 7(4): 319–364[2021–01–30]. https://academic.oup.com/arbitration/Art.-lookup/doi/10.1093/arbitration/7.4.319. DOI:10.1093/arbitration/7.4.319.
15. PRAŠTALO B. Expanded Judicial Review in International Commercial Arbitration: Which Jurisdictions Offer the Optimal Approach from the Private Parties’ Perspective? [J/OL]. ELTE Law Journal, 2019[2021–01–30]. https://eltelawjournal.hu/expanded-judicial-review-in-international-commercial-arbitration-which-jurisdictions-offer-the-optimal-approach-from-the-private-parties-perspective/; SCHWEBEL S M. Public policy and arbitral procedure[J/OL]. Justice in International Law, 2011: 220–245[2021–01–30]. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/justice-in-international-law/public-policy-and-arbitral-procedure/DEFBEB88B4AB02A1CA828E56FC0A18AD. DOI:10.1017/cbo9780511793912.021.
16. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York)[S]. DOI:10.1093/arbitration/12.1.83.
