THE CОRPОRАTЕ OPPОRTUNITУ DОCTRINЕ: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AND NATIONAL LEGISLATION

Authors

  • Azimjon Ibrohimov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I8Y2025N41

Keywords:

korporativ imkoniyat, fidutsiar majburiyat, sodiqlik burchi, direktor javobgarligi, ayb, zarar, sababiy bogʻliqlik, manfaatlar toʻqnashuvi, anglo-sakson huquqi

Abstract

This article discusses the doctrine of corporate opportunities and the fiduciary duties of directors in utilizing such opportunities. Within the scope of fiduciary obligations, the focus is placed on prioritizing the company’s interests, avoiding conflicts of interest, and refraining from personal exploitation of corporate opportunities. The development of the “corporate opportunities doctrine” is analyzed through case law examples from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and other common law jurisdictions. Although Uzbekistan’s legislation is not yet fully developed in this area, recent legislative initiatives indicate an intent to incorporate this legal concept. The article highlights the possibility of holding directors civilly liable for misusing corporate opportunities, with a focus on the legal criteria of unlawfulness, fault, damage, and causation.

References

1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “O‘zbekiston Respublikasining fuqarolik qonunchiligini takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”gi Farmoyishi // URL: https://www.lex.uz/docs/-4272621;

2. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022-yil 8-noyabrdagi “Korporativ munosabatlarning huquqiy asoslarini yanada takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi PQ-415-son Qarori;

3. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik kodeksini tasdiqlash haqida”gi Qonuni loyihasi // URL: https://regulation.gov.uz/uz/d/29059 ;

4. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi “Xo‘jalik jamiyatlarining ijro organi, kuzatuv kengashi va majoritar ishtirokchilarining mas'uliyatini oshirish to‘g‘risida” Qonuni loyihasi, 30/11/2023, ID 90058 https://regulation.gov.uz/uz/d/90058

5. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik kodeksi // URL: https://lex.uz/docs/-22525;

6. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Mas’uliyati cheklangan va qo‘shimcha mas’uliyatli jamiyatlar to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni, O‘RQ-310-II-son 06.12.2001 // URL: https://lex.uz/docs/-22525;

7. Corporate governance and directors' liabilities: legal, economic, and sociological analyses on corporate social responsibility / ed. by K.J. Hopt, G. Teubner. Berlin, 1985. P. 295-300.

8. The Anatomy of Corporate Law / ed. by R. Kraakman, J. Armour, P. Davies et al. Oxford, 2009. P. 165-166.

9. Clark R. Corporate Law. Boston-Toronto, 1986. С. 223-225.

10. Конфликт интересов. Дедов Д.И. – М.: Wolters Kluwer Russia, 2004. –С. 1.

11. Cook v. Deeks sud qarori (1916), [1 Appeal Cases 563]

12. Bundesgerichtshof, Urteil vom 1986, veröffentlicht in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW), S. 584.

13. Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v. Cooley, High Court (England), 1972, reported in: [1972] 1 W.L.R. 443.

14. Гражданское право: учеб. в 3 т. Т. 1 / под ред. А.П. Сергеева. С. 963; Гражданское право: учеб. в 4 т. Т. 1. Общая часть / под ред. Е.А. Суханова.

15. Жукова Ю.Д. Соотношение противоправности и вины при нарушении руководителем хозяйственного общества требований разумности и добросовестности // Гражданское право. 2014. N 1. С. 10-13.

16. Иоффе О.С. Обязательственное право. М., 1975. С. 113-128.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-08-09

Published

2025-08-10

How to Cite

Ibrohimov, A. (2025). THE CОRPОRАTЕ OPPОRTUNITУ DОCTRINЕ: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AND NATIONAL LEGISLATION. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 5(8), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I8Y2025N41