SCIENTIFIC NEED AND CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF DIGITIZATION OF MEDIEVAL SOURCES

Authors

  • Gulzoda Qobulova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6SI2Y2026N06

Keywords:

digitization, source studies, medieval manuscripts, cultural heritage, digital humanities, information technologies, metadata, electronic archives, codiology, MSI, XML-TEI, artificial intelligence.

Abstract

This scientific article analyzes the scientific necessity, theoretical and methodological foundations of the process of digitizing medieval written sources, and the role of modern information technologies in source studies. The results of the study reveal the importance of the digitization process in preserving historical heritage, introducing it into scientific circulation, and ensuring global scientific integration. The study scientifically substantiates the role of multispectral imaging (MSI), XML-TEI standards, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the preservation of manuscripts. The author evaluates the digitization process as a strategic step in creating a “digital twin” of the source and introducing it into global scientific circulation.

References

1. Suter S., et al. Digital Imaging of Ancient Manuscripts: Beyond Visual Appearance // Journal of Cultural Heritage. — 2014. — Vol. 15. — № 4. — P. 367–378.

2. Smith M. E., Lobo J. Digital Humanities. — London: Excelic Press LLC, 2020. — 406 p.

3. Berry, David M. (ed.). Understanding Digital Humanities. — London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 10-12-p.

4. Warwick C., Terras M., Nyhan J. Digital Humanities in Practice. — London: Facet Publishing, 2012. — 448 b.

5. Sahle P. What is a Scholarly Digital Edition? // Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices / Ed. by M. J. Driscoll, E. Pierazzo. — Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2016. — P. 19–39.

6. Driscoll M. J., Pierazzo E. (eds.) Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices. — Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2016. — 460 p.

7. Sarkis Y. Catalogue of the Arabic Manuscripts in the Library of the Patriarchate of Jerusalem. — Jerusalem, 1929. — 412 p.

8. Déroche F. Islamic Codicology: An Introduction to the Study of Manuscripts in Arabic Script. — London: Al-Furqān Islamic Heritage Foundation, 2006. — 352 p.

9. Gacek A. The Arabic Manuscript Tradition: A Glossary of Technical Terms. — Leiden: Brill, 2001. — 152 p.

10. Déroche F. Qur’ans of the Umayyads: A First Overview. — Leiden: Brill, 2014. — 284 p.

11. O‘rinboyev A. Sharq qo‘lyozmalarini tavsiflash masalalari. — Toshkent: Fan, 1978. — 186 b.

12. Munavvarov Sh. O‘rta asr Sharq qo‘lyozmalarining ilmiy tavsifi. — Toshkent: Fan, 1985. — 204 b.

13. Hasaniy M. O‘zbekistonda sharq qo‘lyozmalarini o‘rganish va tavsiflash an’analari. — Toshkent: Fan, 1992. — 172 b.

14. O‘rinboyev A. Manbashunoslik asoslari. — Toshkent, 2002. — 312 b.

15. Terras M. Digital Curiosities: Resource Creation Via Amateur Digitisation // Literary and Linguistic Computing. — 2011. — Vol. 25. — № 4. — P. 425–438.

Downloads

Submitted

2026-03-01

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Qobulova, G. (2026). SCIENTIFIC NEED AND CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF DIGITIZATION OF MEDIEVAL SOURCES. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 6(S/2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6SI2Y2026N06