ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНЫЙ ОСОБЕННОСТИ УЧАСТИЕ ЗАЩИТНИКА НА ПРЕДВАРИТЕЛЬНОМ СЛЕДСТВИИ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5SI1Y2025N65Ключевые слова:
защитник, предварительное следствие, либерализация, уголовное судопроизводство, суд, судья, правовые реформыАннотация
Настоящая статья рассматривает проблематику увеличения объема процессуальных полномочий защитника в досудебном производстве, что тесно связано с его ролью в процессе формирования доказательственной базы. По нашему мнению, предоставление защитнику права непосредственно участвовать в собирании доказательств на досудебной стадии позволило бы значительно повысить эффективность юридической помощи, оказываемой участникам уголовного процесса, способствовало бы достижению объективной истины по делу и максимально гарантировало бы соблюдение фундаментальных прав и законных интересов личности.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Karimov I.A. Our main goal is democratization and renewal of society, reforming and modernization of the country. Speech at the joint session of the Legislative Chamber and the Senate of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan, January 28, 2005 ⁄ ⁄ The Uzbek people will never and never depend on anyone. Vol. 13. - T.: Ўzbekiston, 2005. - С. 94.
2. See about it: Karimov I.A. Our highest goal is independence and prosperity of the motherland, freedom and well-being of the people. Report at the first session of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan of the second convocation, January 22, 2000 // Our highest goal - independence and prosperity of the Motherland, freedom and well-being of the people.
Т. 8. - T.: Ўzbekiston, 2000. - С. 334.
3. Pikalov I.A. Adversariality in the system of principles of criminal procedure and its implementation by the defense party at pre-trial stages: Author's thesis for the degree of Candidate of Law - Ekaterinburg, 2006. // http://
4. Kanyazov E.S. Improvement of the institute of advocacy - the most important task of reforms of the judicial and legal system // J. Ҳukuk va burch. - 2009. - № 1.- С.
74.
5. Kamishin V.A. Defender as a subject of evidence gathering: desired and actual., //Vestnik OGU- 2005. - С. 62.
6. Criminal Justice Administration / F. Remington, D. Newman, E. Kunball, M. Melîi, H. Goldstein. Merilî: The Bobbs, 2003. - С. 218.
7. Martynchik E.G. Advocate's investigation in criminal proceedings.// Theoretical and methodological foundations of the doctrine of advocate's investigation.
Yurist 2009. - С. 65.
8. Vedernikov A.N. Actual issues of participation of the defense counsel at the stage of preliminary investigation. Dissertation of candidate of juridical science - M., 2007 - P. 197.
9. Agutin A.V. Legal tactical aspects of private detective activity. Dis.kan.yu.n.n.- Nizhny Novgorod, 2003, - P.63.
10. Kurdova A.V. Right The right of indigent defendants to defense in the U.S. criminal process // State and Law - 2000, № 7., - P.84.
11. Draft Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (Second Amendments): adopted at the 5th Session of the 11th National People's Congress on March 14, 2012, amendments effective January 1, 2013,
12. Filimonov B.A. On the legal position of the defense counsel at the preliminary investigation in the criminal process of Germany // Bulletin of Moscow University.2010, № 6. - С.78.
13. Martynchik E.G. Lawyer's investigation in criminal proceedings. Theoretical and methodological foundations of the doctrine of lawyer investigation. Jurist
2009 г. - С. 47.
14. Zakomoldin A.V. On the right of the defense counsel to collect and present evidence necessary for the provision of qualified legal assistance in criminal proceedings// Vestnik of Samara Humanitarian Academy// 2010. № 1. - С.122.
15. Yaselskaya V.V.. Activity of the defense lawyer on gathering evidence at the stage of preliminary investigation: Author's thesis. Dissertation. kan.yur.nauk: -M.: RGB, 2010. -С. 87.
16. Borodinova T.G., Demidov I.F. Prosecution and defense: the problem of equal opportunities // Journal of Russian Law.- 2005. - №2. - С.42.
17. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Federal Republic of Germany § 147 part 1, see: publishup.uni-potsdam.de.
18. Ibid. § 475 part 1 of the German Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO BRD), see publishup.uni-potsdam.de.
19. United States Federal Rules of Evidence.
20. Mc Gough L.S. Good enough for government work: the constitutional duty to preserve forensic interviews of child victims // Law and Contemporary Problems - Durham, 2002. Vol. 665. N 1. - P. 191
