UMUMTA’LIM MAKTABLARIDA MATEMATIKA DARSLARIDA O‘QUVCILARNING MOLIYAVIY SAVODXONLIGINI RIVOJLANTIRISH SHAKLLARI VA USULLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I9Y2024N54Ключевые слова:
moliyaviy savodxonlik, qo‘shimcha ta’lim, globallab, flipperd klassroom, rotatsiya, gamifikatsiya, moliya tashkiloti, byudjet, investitsiyaАннотация
Maqolada umumta’lim maktablarida matematika darslarida o‘quvchilarning moliyaviy savodxonligini rivojlantirish shakllari va usullari bayon qilingan. Bo‘limlarni o‘rganishda integratsiyalashgan darslarni o‘tkazish tavsiya etiladi, bir nechta o‘qituvchilarni jalb qilgan holda, bu darslar davomida o‘qituvchilar o‘z fanidan vositalar yordamida mavzuni tushuntiradilar. Shuningdek, umumta’lim dasturlari doirasida moliyaga oid dars mavzularini o‘rganishda moliyaviy savodxonlik sohasidagi bilim va ko‘nikmalarni shakllantirishga alohida e’tibor qaratish lozimligi hamda dars rejasini ishlab chiqishda turli pedagogik usullar qo‘llanilishini e’tiborga olish va butun kursni qurish uchun bitta metodikadan foydalanish shart emas, turli darslarda turli pedagogik usullarni birlashtirish mumkin.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Yoo, S. (2022). Politics of technology: Building institutions of humility in the age of AI and Quantum Computers. Ethics and Information Technology.
2. European Commission. (2019). Cybersecurity Act. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/cybersecurity-act
3. Glickman, O. (2022). Upholding human rights in the quantum age. Ethics & International Affairs, 36(2), 201-219.
4. Quantum Industry Coalition. (2023). Voluntary code of ethics for quantum technologies. https://qic.org/ethics-code
5. Henderson, T. (2023). Verifying the verification: Auditing quantum advantage claims. Cryptography Review, 41(7), 983-1002.
6. Montalban, M. (2024). Private quantum oversight: Features, bugs and policy hacks. Policy Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09462-8
7. Intemann, K. (2020). Ensuring oversight does not undermine inquiry: crafting legitimate quantum technology regulations. Philosophy of Science, 87(5), 859-890.
8. Latour, B. (2023). Entangled oversight: Governing quantum relationships. Limn, 12(3), 99-186.
9. Raman, A. & Church, G. (2021). Regulating quantum intrusion: Challenges & approaches. Harvard National Security Journal, 3(2), 55-99.
10. Quantum Industry Coalition. (2023). Voluntary code of ethics for quantum technologies. https://qic.org/ethics-code
11. Gill, K. (2021). Staying with the trouble: An ethics of care approach to quantum governance. Hastings Center Report, 51(1), 34-42.
12. Danaher, J. (2020). Welcoming robots into the moral circle: A defence of ethical behaviourism. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2023-2049.
13. Grace et al. (2018). When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62, 729-754.
14. Raman, A. & Church, G. (2021). Regulating quantum intrusion: Challenges & approaches. Harvard National Security Journal, 3(2), 55-99.
15. Ellis, J. et al. (2022). Updating export controls for quantum software. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05924.
16. penetrate-quantum. (2023). Standard contract for vulnerability disclosure & bug bounties in quantum technologies. https://pen-quantum.org
17. Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79.
18. Zeng, W. et al. (2022). Steering disruptive knowledge: A new mandate for dual use oversight? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 78(2), 102-109.
19. Karinen, R. & Guston, D. H. (2010). Toward anticipatory governance: The experience with nanotechnology. In G. H. Hadorn et al. (Eds.), Governance and sustainability: New challenges for states, companies and civil society (pp. 217-242). Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences.
20. Yoo, S. (2022). Politics of technology: Building institutions of humility in the age of AI and Quantum Computers. Ethics and Information Technology.
21. Unruh, D., & Nunez-Vasquez, F. (2021). Quantum tech: Political capacity in an emerging institutional field. Research Policy, 50(7), 104-252.
22. Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501-507.
