ECONOMIC RATIONALISM: CONCEPT, EVOLUTION AND THEORETICAL LIMITATIONS

Authors

  • Maxamadixon Ismoilov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I4Y2026N21

Keywords:

economic rationalism, homo economicus, rational choice theory, axiology, ontology, economic consciousness, neoclassical economics, methodological individualism, social inequality, economic justice, ecological economics, behavioral economics, institutional economics, value transformation, philosophical analysis.

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive philosophical analysis of economic rationalism, focusing on its conceptual foundations, historical evolution, and theoretical limitations. Economic rationalism is examined not merely as an analytical tool within economics, but as a broader philosophical paradigm that shapes the understanding of human nature. Particular attention is given to the critical evaluation of the homo economicus model, highlighting its ontological and axiological constraints. The study argues that the neoclassical interpretation of rationality reduces human beings to utility-maximizing agents, neglecting their social, cultural, and ethical dimensions. Furthermore, the article explores the transformation of economic rationalism from classical political economy to contemporary approaches, including behavioral, institutional, and ecological economics. The findings suggest that while economic rationalism remains a significant analytical framework, its explanatory capacity is limited, necessitating its expansion through the integration of value-based, social, and environmental considerations.

References

1. World Bank. (2020). Global Investment Competitiveness Report 2019/2020: Rebuilding Investor Confidence in Times of Uncertainty. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

2. OECD. (2021). Regional Development Policy and Investment Strategies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

3. Schlaudt, O. (2022). Philosophy of Economics: A Heterodox Introduction. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003204077.

4. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations Publishing.

5. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2025). Kapital bozorida investitsiya muhitini yaxshilashga doir qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlari toʻg‘risidagi Farmon.

6. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.

7. Samuelson, P. A. (1967). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

8. Sen, A. (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, Princeton University Press.

9. Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

10. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

12. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

13. Daly, H. E. (1996). Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press.

14. Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

15. Schlaudt, O. (2022). Philosophy of Economics: A Heterodox Introduction. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Submitted

2026-04-18

Published

2026-04-18

How to Cite

Ismoilov, M. (2026). ECONOMIC RATIONALISM: CONCEPT, EVOLUTION AND THEORETICAL LIMITATIONS. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 6(4), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I4Y2026N21