YEVROPA ITTIFOQI VA YEVROPA KENGASHI DOIRASIDA DISKRETSION VAKOLATLAR: CHEGARALAR, NAZORAT VA SUD AMALIYOTI
Kalit so'zlar
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5SI1Y2025N61Kalit so'zlar
Diskretsion vakolatlar, Yevropa Komissiyasi, Yevropa Kengashi, sud nazorati, mutanosiblik tamoyili, Meroni doktrinasi, YI Sudi, ECHR, ma’muriy diskretsiya.Annotasiya
Diskretsion vakolatlar Yevropa Ittifoqi (YI) va Yevropa Kengashida ma’muriy boshqaruvning muhim elementi bo‘lib, huquqiy noaniqlik sharoitida qaror qabul qilish imkoniyatini beradi. Shu bilan birga, ularning qo‘llanilishi qonuniylik, mutanosiblik va sud nazorati tamoyillari bilan cheklangan bo‘lib, suiiste’mollik va boshqaruvdagi o‘zbilarmonlikning oldini oladi. Ushbu maqolada Yevropa Komissiyasi va YI maxsus agentliklarining diskretsion vakolatlari uchun huquqiy asoslar tahlil qilinadi hamda Meroni doktrinasi va Yevropa Ittifoqi Sudining (ECJ) hamda Inson huquqlari bo‘yicha Yevropa Sudining (ECHR) sud amaliyoti orqali nazorat mexanizmlari ko‘rib chiqiladi.
Manbalar
1. Рихтер, И. и Шупперт, Г.Ф. (2000) Судебная практика по административному праву: Учебное пособие. Пер. с нем. Москва: Юристъ.
2. Pesce, G. (2020) ‘Discretionary power of public administration and control of public debt’, Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 29.
3. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), OJ C 202, 7.6.2016, pp. 47–390. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12016E%2FTXT
4. European Parliament. (2022). The boundaries of the Commission’s discretionary powers when handling petitions and potential infringements of EU law: From legal limits to political collaboration in enforcement? Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, PE 703.589. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses
5. Case C-12/03 P, Commission v. Tetra Laval BV, ECLI:EU:C:2005:87, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 February 2005.
6. Case C-441/07 P, Commission v. Alrosa Co. Ltd, ECLI:EU:C:2010:377, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010.
7. Mendes, J. (2016) ‘Law and administrative discretion in the EU: value of a comparative perspective’, Comparative Administrative Conference, Yale.
8. Case C-9/56, Meroni & Co., Industrie Metallurgiche, SpA v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, ECLI:EU:C:1958:7, Judgment of the Court of 13 June 1958.
9. Case C-270/12, United Kingdom v. European Parliament and Council, ECLI:EU:C:2014:18, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 January 2014.
10. Бюро ОБСЕ по демократическим институтам и правам человека (2013) Руководство по мониторингу административной юстиции. [Электронный ресурс]. Доступно по ссылке: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/6/108280.pdf
11. Европейский суд по правам человека (ЕСПЧ) (2017) Постановление от 15 марта 2017 года. [Электронный ресурс]. Доступно по ссылке: http://www.echr.ru/documents/doc/2467581/2467581-006.htm
