THE ROLE OF CORPUS OF CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN ENGLISH (COCA) IN ENHANCING WRITING INSTRUCTION

Gulnoza Radjabova

doi:10.47390/SPR1342V4I6Y2024N102

Mualliflar

Gulnoza Radjabova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I6Y2024N102

Kalit so'zlar:

COCA corpus, leksik murakkablik, yozma ko'rsatma, EFL darslari, kollokvium, kalit so’z kontekstga (KWIC).

Annotatsiya

EFL talabalarining aksariyati uchun eng qiyin til mahorati ularning so'z boyligi repertuarining cheklanganligi va yanada rivojlangan so'z birikmalaridan foydalanishga nisbatan noaniqligi sababli yozish mahorati hisoblanadi. Ushbu maqola yozishni o'rgatishda Kokaning qo'llanilishi bo'yicha eksperimental tadqiqotlarni o'rganadi, uning so'z boyligini oshirish, grammatik aniqlikni oshirish, janrga xos yozish ko'nikmalarini targ'ib qilish va umumiy yozish qobiliyatini rivojlantirishdagi roliga e'tibor qaratadi.

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

Abdurakhmonova, N., Urdishev, K. (2019). Corpus based teaching Uzbek as a foreign language. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (J-FLTAL), 6(1-2019), 131-7.

Аtaboev N.B. (2020): Ingliz tili korpusining funktsional xususiyatlari (СОСА misolida): Аvtoreferat dis. … kand. ped. nauk / UzDJTU, T. – 2020

Boulton, A. (2009). Data-driven learning: Reasonable fears and rational reassurance. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 81-106.

Boulton, A., (2010). “Data-Driven Learning: Taking the Computer Out of the Equation,” Language Learning, vol. 60, no. 3, pp.534-572.

Chu, X. Q., & Liu, C. M. (2007). Self-access to advanced English vocabulary acquisition–Corpus-based approach. Media in Foreign Language Instruction, (5), 12-17.

Davies, M., (2010). “The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the First Reliable Monitor Corpus of English,” Literacy and Linguistic Computing, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 447-464.

Dennen, V. P., (2004). “Cognitive Apprenticeship in Educational Practice: Research on Scaffolding, Modelling, Mentoring, and Coaching as Instructional Strategies,” in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (Jonassen, eds.), Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M.E., Short, D.J., (2004). “The Eight Components of Sheltered Instruction,” in Making Content Comprehensible for English Language Learners, The SIOP Model, pp. 234-267.

Hoey, M.P., (1991). “Another Perspective on Coherence and Cohesive Harmony,” in Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses (Ventola eds.), pp. 385-414, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Horst, M., (2013). “Mainstreaming Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition,” Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol.16, no. 1, pp.171-188.

Jafarpour, M., Mansoory, N., (2014). “Teaching Semantic Prosody of English Verbs through the DDL Approach and its Effect on Learner’s Vocabulary Choice Appropriateness in a Persian EFL Context. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.149-161.

Kim, J., (2014). “Predicting L2 Writing Proficiency Using Linguistic Complexity Measures: A Corpus-Based Study,” English Teaching, vol. 69, no. 4, pp.27-51.

Laufer, B., Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size & use: Lexical richness in L2 written productions. Applied Linguistics 16 (3), pp. 307-322

Romer, U. (2009). Corpus research and practice: What help do teachers need and what can we offer? In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.09rom

Schmitt, N., Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. New York: Macmillan, 2010

Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., (2014). “A Reassessment of Frequency and Vocabulary Size in L2 Vocabulary Teaching,” Language Teaching, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 484-503.