SUDYALAR OLIY KENGASHINI SUDYALARNING CHINAKAM HAMJAMIYATI ORGANIGA AYLANTIRISHNING KONSTITUTSIYAVIY MASALALARI

Mualliflar

  • Botirjon Qosimov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SP1342V3I10Y2023N32

Kalit so'zlar:

sud hokimiyati, Sudyalar oliy kengashi, sudlar, sudyalar.

Annotatsiya

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Sudyalar oliy kengashi konstitutsiyaviy maqomiga binoan sudyalarning hamjamiyati organi hisoblanadi. Biroq uning shakllantirish tartibi uning bunday emasligini ko‘rsatadi.  Ushbu maqolada Sudyalar oliy kengashini chinakam sudyalar hamjamiyati organiga aylantirishga doir masalalar tanqidiy tahlil etilgan. Sudyalar oliy kengashini sudyalarning o‘zlari saylagan taqdirdagina u sudyalarning chinakam hamjamiyati organiga aylanishi mumkin degan xulosaga kelingan. Bu borada O‘zbekiston Konstitutsiyasining tegishli normalariga o‘zgartirish kiritish bo‘yicha takliflar ilgari surilgan.

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

Косимов, Б., 2022. Constitutional Elements of Judicial Independence: are they enough in the Constitution of Uzbekistan?. Общество и инновации, 3(10/S), pp. 205-212.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Konstitutsiyasi 135-moddasi. https://lex.uz/docs/20596

Preshova D., Damjanovski I., Nechev Z. The Effectiveness of the ‘European Model of Judicial Independence in the Western Balkans: Judicial Councils as a Solution or a New Cause of Concern for Judicial Reforms //CLEER Paper Series. – 2017. – Т. 1. ‒ P. 16.

Batafsil ma’lumot uchun qarang: United Nations Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary. https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/UN-Basic-principles-independence-judiciary-1985-eng.pdf Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary in the LAWASIA region. https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Beijing-Statement.pdf

Latimer House Guidelines. https://www.cmja.org/downloads/latimerhouse/commprinthreearms.pdf

Recommendation on Judicial Independence. https://advokat-prnjavorac.com/legislation/Recommendation.pdf

European Charter on the Status of the Judge. https://rm.coe.int/16807473ef

Garoupa N., Ginsburg T. Guarding the guardians: Judicial councils and judicial independence //The American Journal of Comparative Law. – 2009. – Т. 57. – №. 1. ‒ P. 3.

Batafsil ma’lumot uchun qarang: Guide to the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. https://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/workinggroups/guide/encj_guide_version_march_2015.pdf

Autheman V., Elena S. Global best practices: Judicial Councils //IFES Rule of Law White Paper Series. – 2004. ‒ P. 7.

O‘sha manba. ‒ P. 2.

Garoupa N., Ginsburg T. The Economics of Judicial Councils. – 2007. ‒ P. 3. https://escholarship.org/content/qt4264z9r8/qt4264z9r8.pdf

Garoupa N., Ginsburg T. Guarding the guardians: Judicial councils and judicial independence //The American Journal of Comparative Law. – 2009. – Т. 57. – №. 1. ‒ P. 5.

Albers P., Voermans W. J. M. Councils for the Judiciary in EU Countries //Wim Voermans and Pim Albers, COUNCILS FOR THE JUDICIARY IN EU COUNTRIES, Council of Europe, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Strasbourg. – 2003. ‒ P.14.

Qarang: O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Konstitutsiyasi 135-moddasi. https://lex.uz/docs/20596

Qarang: “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Sudyalar oliy kengashi to‘g‘risida”gi Qonunning 4-moddasi. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi qonun hujjatlari to‘plami, 2017 y., 14-son, 214-modda. https://lex.uz/docs/3153668

O‘sha manba.

Autheman V., Elena S. Global best practices: Judicial Councils //IFES Rule of Law White Paper Series. – 2004. ‒ P. 2.

O‘sha manba. ‒ P. 6.

Garoupa N., Ginsburg T. The Economics of Judicial Councils. – 2007. ‒ P. 3-7. UC Berkeley Latin American and Caribbean Law and Economics Association (ALACDE) Annual Papers. https://escholarship.org/content/qt4264z9r8/qt4264z9r8.pdf

O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Konstitutsiyasi 95 va 135-moddasi. https://lex.uz/docs/6445145

Guide to the European Network of the Councils for the Judiciary. https://pgwrk-websitemedia.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/production/pwk-web-encj2017-p/Reports/ENCJ_Guide_version_January-2023.pdf – P. 11.

Council of Europe standards on judicial independence. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690623/EPRS_BRI(2021)690623_EN.pdf

IBA Minimum Standards of Judicial Independence (Adopted 1982). https://www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=bb019013-52b1-427c-ad25-a6409b49fe29

COMPARATIVE NOTE ON MODELS OF JUDICIAL COUNCILS AS INDEPENDENT AND SELF-GOVERNING BODIES. Warsaw, 16 December 2021 Opinion-Nr.: JUD-KAZ/415/2021 https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/0/e/509090.pdf – P. 14.

2022 ENCJ SURVEY ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE PUBLISHED. https://www.encj.eu/node/620

Yuklashlar

Nashr qilingan

2023-10-17

Havola

Qosimov, B. (2023). SUDYALAR OLIY KENGASHINI SUDYALARNING CHINAKAM HAMJAMIYATI ORGANIGA AYLANTIRISHNING KONSTITUTSIYAVIY MASALALARI. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари / Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук / Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 3(10). https://doi.org/10.47390/SP1342V3I10Y2023N32